To: NormsRevenge
Exactly where the hell is it in the US Constitution where it is defined that foriegn laws should be considered in interpreting the US Constitution? This is absolutely crazy!
3 posted on
04/02/2004 9:52:23 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Its Treason. Get used to it.
4 posted on
04/02/2004 9:59:04 PM PST by
Finalapproach29er
(" Permitting homosexuality didn't work out very well for the Roman Empire")
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Why set precedent when you can follow it?
A sad state of affairs.
13 posted on
04/02/2004 11:09:36 PM PST by
America's Resolve
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing (hint SPAIN!))
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
I want the USSC to be more that "skeptical" I want it to be downright hostile to the idea.
14 posted on
04/02/2004 11:12:54 PM PST by
Texasforever
(I can’t kill enough brain cells to become a democrat just by drinking.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson