[F14 Pilot]

PING

[Support Free Republic]

Click The Logo To Donate

[McGavin999]

Well, we all know that's the plan. Unfortunately for the Mad Mullahs the Iraqi people don't seem too interested.

[Makedonski]

Solution ---> bomb Iran?

[yonif]

The whole Arab/Islamic world is at war with non-Muslims.

[Mike Darancette]

Last April, an Iranian cleric, Kadhem al-Husseini al-Haeri, issued a religious edict and distributed to Shiite mullahs in Iraq

I thought that Iran was Sunni Muslem.

[Fledermaus]

It doesn't matter. Bush isn't going to to anything to Iran OR Syria in an "election year".

Funny, I thought he was a leader and a different man for the job.

Instead, he's nothing but a typical entrenched politician only caring about his ego, his job, his mention in the history books.

And Kerry would be worse exactly how? I'm not voting for him, but I still can't find a reason to vote for Bush other than I don't want Kerry. I'm getting tired of choosing between two worthless candidates.

Go ahead, flame me! I don't care. The GOP has turned into the Democratic party because they want to protect their power. When the argument against a Dem is "they'll spend even MORE worthless money on pork projects", the argument to elect the Republican becomes moot.

Just look how the GOP "establishment" backs Arlen Specter this year. Even Rick "should be in a" Santorum, a normally conservative man, backs Specter over Toomey! What a crock of s**t.

We need to develop a viable conservative party and quit cowering on the margins.

But it's not going to happen and so more and more people will stop voting GOP and staying home while the Dems keep feeding their attack dogs red meat, get out the union vote and money stolen from members with no accountability, and eventually take it all back and make it even worse.

Oh wait? Worse? Hard to see how these days as long as the GOP is morphing into the Democrats. If the Dems were smart now, they'd write off their left wing and go back to the DLC middle and move to the right.

They'd be in office another 50 years.

[Mo1]

Iran has clear objectives in Iraq. The only question is whether the United States still has clear objectives in Iraq – and whether Washington recognizes that this war front just got wider.

Oh I'm sure our side has a pretty good idea on what's going on and I trust our side is in the process of dealing with these terrorists

[NaughtiusMaximus]

An interesting post. I've gotten the strong impression that there has been a multidimensional civil war brewing behind the scenes and that Iran was very much an interested party. Thanks for filling in some of the gaps.

[The Duke]

Were Afghanistan and Iraq fingers, then Iran would be the "mother of all zits"! The leaders there should tread carefully, and use their brains before using their mouths.

[F14 Pilot]

Thought you might like this post.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

What the other news accounts left out was one significant, but well-established fact: Al-Sadr works for Iran. He is an Iranian agent. His authority comes from Iran.

I thought that was the case.

[Tailgunner Joe]

A follower of Iraqi Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al Sadr joins a protest against
the closure of the newspaper Al Hawza in front of the headquarters of
the U.S.-led administration in Baghdad, April 2, 2004.
Photo by Ceerwan Aziz/Reuters

[goldstategop]

There's little doubt Iran has made it move. Moqtada al-Sadr's guys took over the government offices in Basra. They're hoping for a successful coup d'etat along the lines of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917. Let's put a swift end to this fantasy they have of a theocratic state in Iraq friendly to terrorists and hostile to the Great Satan, shall we? Let's roll!!!

[Savage Beast]

The people of the West, especially "Liberals", which include most journalists, refuse to face reality because it is too frightening and horrible to contemplate, but sooner or later reality is going to face them. The people of the West had better maintain their strength. They're going to need it.

[Long Cut]

Iran declared war when they seized the American Embassy in 1979. That was an Act Of War by all definitions.

Over the intervening years, they have only confirmed it with their support of terrorism agains us.

I know why Jimmy Carter failed to declare war...a lack of stones. But Ronald Reagan's reluctance to do so, especially after the destruction of our embassy in Lebanon and the murders of our Marines there, was and is incomprehensible to me. It remains my one point of disagreement with his policies.

[bogdanPolska12]

Hey Pilot. There is no doubt that Iran is involved in this. That is why battle ground has been drawn. Today operation is a breaking point, almost like El Alamo by Montgomery. This is fight till the end. We don't need to bomb Iran, we can use same tactic we did in Afghanistan and then applied in Iraq. Most Iranians are very pro Americans so we should use that for our advantage.

Good news also is Sharon has put Arafat on assassination list, and now breaking on FNC, Saudi bank scandal. More to come.

Bogdan

[JamesA]

More targets.....

[af_vet_1981]

Nobody else is saying it, so, once again, it is left to me to explain what really happened in Iraq yesterday. Iran declared war on the U.S.

Good. Let us totally destroy that regime, down to the last mullah. I have never forgotten our Embassay hostages. The world should fear to harm American diplomats or citizens.

[FreedomPoster]

>>"People have to be taught not to collapse morally before the means used by the Great Satan if it stays in Iraq," the fatwa read. "It will try to spread moral decay, incite lust by allowing easy access to stimulating satellite channels and spread debauchery to weaken people's faith."

Time to bring in WMD - Weapons of MTV Destruction. They can't resist the Britney Bomb.