To: tcuoohjohn
Translation: No one violated the CIA statute so we're gonna try to set someone up for a false statement or obstruction charge. Classic prosecution tactic when they don't have a case.
3 posted on
04/05/2004 10:01:49 AM PDT by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
To: colorado tanker
It's just a gut feel but my money's on Dick Clarke being the leaker.
4 posted on
04/05/2004 10:04:31 AM PDT by
Bob
To: colorado tanker
Translation: No one violated the CIA statute so we're gonna try to set someone up for a false statement or obstruction charge. Classic prosecution tactic when they don't have a case.
Sounds familiar...
Signed,
Martha Stewart
5 posted on
04/05/2004 10:04:50 AM PDT by
isthisnickcool
(I'm isthisnickcool, and I approved this post!)
To: colorado tanker
The statute is a federal statute under 18 USC. I don't recall The CIA having legislative power.
6 posted on
04/05/2004 10:08:04 AM PDT by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson