Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Lileks: Sept. 11 Might Have Been Different If ...
The Newhouse News Service ^ | April 7, 2004 | James Lileks

Posted on 04/07/2004 11:21:24 AM PDT by quidnunc

The Sept. 11 report, as expected, will call the attack "preventable." As commission head Thomas Kean, a Republican, noted:

"If we had been able to put (the hijackers) on the watch list of the airlines, the two who were in the country; again if we'd stopped some of those people at the borders; if we had acted earlier on al-Qaida when (it) was smaller and just getting started … the whole story might have been different."

If. If. Maybe. If. If George W. Bush had phoned the Saudis on the first day of his administration and told them any act of Islamist terror would result in a mushroom cloud over Mecca, and that he would consider it "what we call in bowling a practice frame," it might have been different. It might have been different if B-52s had taken out the Taliban in February 2001 — and we all know how Ted Kennedy et al. would have exploded in a rain of bile had Bush kicked off his term with a pre-emptive war. The articles of impeachment would have been drawn up before the first wave of bombers returned to base.

It might have been different "if we'd stopped some of those people at the borders" by pulling aside all Arab-looking young males, fingerprinting them, photographing them and putting them into a national database of The Usual Suspects. That would have gone over well, eh? The American Civil Liberties Union would have loaded the catapults with lawyers and hurled them by the dozens into every courtroom in the country.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at newhousenews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2004 11:21:25 AM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Hindsight only has value as a lesson for the future, it isn't really even relevant to what has already happened.
2 posted on 04/07/2004 11:34:14 AM PDT by atomicpossum (Hobbits offer only Tolkien resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Donate Here By Secure Server
3 posted on 04/07/2004 11:34:29 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
if is the middle word in life.
4 posted on 04/07/2004 11:34:59 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
The undeniable truth is that had Clinton, and Clarke, done their jobs and responded to any of the proceeding AQ attacks, there would have been no 9/11.

5 posted on 04/07/2004 11:35:26 AM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Nothing could have prevented 9/11 from taking place. Even if there was a "watch list" established, the hijackers could have just as easily taken control of the Fed Ex planes that fly every night, and done the same thing.

The only way it could have been prevented is if bin Laden and company had been killed outright, for the attacks initiated during the 1990's.
6 posted on 04/07/2004 11:36:58 AM PDT by Badeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
If "ifs and "buts" were candy and nuts we'd all have a wonderful Christmas.
7 posted on 04/07/2004 11:40:08 AM PDT by Humvee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle.
8 posted on 04/07/2004 11:45:18 AM PDT by beelzepug (growing more confused by the minute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
If we had some eggs we could have ham and eggs if we had some ham.
9 posted on 04/07/2004 11:49:04 AM PDT by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Not even that could have done it. Nothing could have stopped a group of unremarkable men with no criminal backgrounds, no guns or knives, or supicious behavior, who were prepared to kill themselves from doing what they did.

We live in a free society, dominated by a powerful left-wing, civil rights-minded minority that seeks to prevent any defense of our country.

10 posted on 04/07/2004 11:51:05 AM PDT by Deb (Democrats HATE America...there's no other explanation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
bump
11 posted on 04/07/2004 4:22:45 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Lileks bump
12 posted on 04/08/2004 1:18:05 AM PDT by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Humvee
Yep. I think Rice demonstrated this very well this morning, much to the chagrin of Bene-vista, B Kerry and Jamie Gorelicks dismay.

For that alone, I'd give Doctor Rice a Freedom Medal!
13 posted on 04/08/2004 10:16:50 AM PDT by Badeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Deb,

Its no different than the day before the first Kamikaze attack was launched against us in WWII. Prior to that, we simply could not comprehend the notion, preferring Patton's view: "Your job is not to die gloriously for your country, but to make the other poor son of a bitch die for his!"

We couldn't have stopped it, because we couldn't envision it. Once again, we forgot the lessons of history.

Its getting more expensive, in real terms, each time we have to "relearn" those lessons from the past.
14 posted on 04/08/2004 10:19:58 AM PDT by Badeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Actually, the United States pioneered the technique that came to be known as the "kamikazi attack". Although "ours" was strictly voluntary, the deal was to have a fighter or fighter/bomber go beyond it's range where return was possible. This would catch the enemy unawares.

I believe some of the first uses were in the Battle of Midway. A military historian can correct me on the first occurrence, but it's pretty well known that the Japanese were so impressed with the effectiveness of the method they adopted it as soon as possible.

15 posted on 04/12/2004 9:47:15 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Thats the first I've ever heard of the US Military using suicide attacks. Perhaps you are confusing the Doolittle raid, which was launched with no hope of recovery (for the obvious reason) onboard the carrier used to launch the strike, or due to the fact it was questionable if the bombers could reach mainland China due to the early launch.

At Midway, we launched are bombers at "maximum range"....but it was hardly a "suicide mission". Most, if not all were "recovered" on board, with the exception of the Yorktown's planes, again, for the obvious reason (it was burning for the second time in the battle).

"Your duty isn't to die for your country. Its to make the other poor son of a bitch die for his" - General George Patton.

That quote pretty much sums up the US military's viewpoint on this topic.
16 posted on 04/12/2004 10:12:27 AM PDT by Badeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Actually, the Midway attacks were unintentional kamikaze strikes: the TBD aircraft was obsolete and had no business attacking a Japanese carrier group, where A6Ms would be available in abundance.
17 posted on 04/12/2004 10:15:25 AM PDT by Poohbah (Darkdrake Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Captain Fleming's Vindicator wound up on one of the back turrets of the Mikuma at the battle of Midway - but the Japanese didn't adopt Kamikaze tactics until later in the war.

The American Kamikaze Corps wasn't formed until much later, by the looks of it.

18 posted on 04/12/2004 2:07:11 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
Thanks for that URL.

First time I ever heard of it was way back in a government class at Indiana University being taught by Dr. Joseph Sutton, formerly of the OAS (early 1960s stuff).

There he was in a large lecture hall with about 250 students, most from Indiana, and he was talking about how WWII with Japan got started and who first proved the utility of diving an airplane into a large ship at sea in order to sink or disable it.

For a number of reasons, guys from Indiana seemed to have been disproportionately sent to the Pacific war. Sutton's discussion was, of course, heresy! But it was remembered by at least some.

19 posted on 04/12/2004 2:46:30 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
http://www.fordpinto.com/images/side-girls.jpg

Is that the American Kamikaze Corps?

20 posted on 04/12/2004 2:47:59 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson