Skip to comments.
Generals weary of low troop levels (Novak: Pentagon generals won't vote for Bush)
suntimes.com ^
| April 8, 2004
| ROBERT NOVAK
Posted on 04/08/2004 10:37:07 AM PDT by Destro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Novak seems to have 2 personalities - on television he seems pro Bush and in print he is anti-Bush.
1
posted on
04/08/2004 10:37:09 AM PDT
by
Destro
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
7 |
Pennsylvania |
890.00
|
29
|
30.69
|
569
|
1.56
|
235.00
|
16
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
2
posted on
04/08/2004 10:38:53 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
To: Destro
Now I'm absolutely convinced that Novak is full of cow chips.
To: Destro
With Sen. Edward M. Kennedy setting the Democratic line by.............giving aid & comfort to the enemy from the Senate floor.
4
posted on
04/08/2004 10:39:30 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: Destro
This is just a waste of bandwidth. Novak is so wacky at times I have given up even reading what he has to say anymore. Is there some sort of brain disease going around at CNN?
5
posted on
04/08/2004 10:39:59 AM PDT
by
snooker
(Clinton's definition of terror ... Monica I told you not to use your teeth.)
To: Destro
Novak is slime! No way are most Generals in the Pentagon going to vote for Kerry and everyone can take that to the bank! Only Generals opposing Pres Bush are the Clintonite holdovers!
As for force levels -- go see Congress! These same Clintonite Generals have been blocking reform every step of the way as well. Them and Novak can stuff it.
Novak is overly impressed with himself and about the only people who would talk to him would be Clintonite Generals -- the ones that General Myers and others from the Joint Chiefs would like to get rid of for leaking.
6
posted on
04/08/2004 10:41:11 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04 -- Losing is not an Option!)
To: Destro
This is nothing but malarkey.
Utterly unbelievable.
Novak is a nutcase.
To: Destro
Unless I misunderstood what I've been hearing, Bush has said on numerous occassions that the Generals will get all they want...they just have to ask. Karen Hughes was just on, saying that unlike Vietnam, this war is being fought by the military commanders, who are making the calls. So who's lying, here?
8
posted on
04/08/2004 10:43:34 AM PDT
by
cwb
(Kerry: Sadr is a legitmate voice in Iraq being silenced by America)
To: EternalVigilance
Look what news channel he works for.
To: Destro
10
posted on
04/08/2004 10:45:43 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: anniegetyourgun
10 or 12 years ago we had 18 Divisions in the army...Now we have 10...Not Bush's fault
To: Destro
While Democrats roar, the generals are silent -- in public. Many confide that they will not cast their normal Republican votes on Nov. 2. They cannot bring themselves to vote for John Kerry, who has been a consistent Senate vote against the military. But they say they are unable to vote for Don Rumsfeld's boss, and so will not vote at all. This is extremely hard to believe. I'd like to know if anyone backs up what Novak is saying.
To: Destro
Novak: Pentagon generals won't vote for BushCan you please explain to me how you drew this conclusion? I have read the article and I do not draw that conclusion. Every general I know and every officer I know, retired and active, is NOT supporting Kerry! Can't stand him. So are you saying that Generals are going to stay home and not vote! That is the only conclusion that I can draw. PS I hate when people add their own subtitles to articles. Just post it as it is!
13
posted on
04/08/2004 10:48:12 AM PDT
by
TrueBeliever9
(aut viam inveniam aut faciam)
To: xzins
This article is so against everything that I know - especially given General Franks and the majority of the opinions of the Point alumni.
14
posted on
04/08/2004 10:50:05 AM PDT
by
TrueBeliever9
(aut viam inveniam aut faciam)
To: Destro
Novak seems to have 2 personalities - on television he seems pro Bush and in print he is anti-Bush. Do you detect an anti-Bush tone in this article? Simply reporting factual information which we don't want to hear does not make someone "anti-Bush". If the facts were slanted or there was a tone of glee, then I would understand the assessment.
The only shortcoming I see, at first blush, is an understatement of foreign troop support. He also missed mentioning that the South Koreans have pledged a relatively large number of troops soon.
To: EternalVigilance
There is reason to believe that there is much unhappiness at the Pentagon with Rummy on the troop level question.
16
posted on
04/08/2004 10:53:25 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
To: Destro
Novak has been slowly losing his grip on reality for several years.
17
posted on
04/08/2004 10:54:54 AM PDT
by
Darlin'
("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
To: Destro
"But they say they are unable to vote for Don Rumsfeld's boss, and so will not vote at all."Generals may be many things, but stupid is not one of them.
DE OPPRESSO LIBER
18
posted on
04/08/2004 10:56:24 AM PDT
by
bra
To: TrueBeliever9
So are you saying that Generals are going to stay home and not vote!Just read the last sentence of the article.
To: PhiKapMom
No way are most Generals in the Pentagon going to vote for Kerry See my comment #13 - Destro added to the title and no where in the article do I see this statement!
20
posted on
04/08/2004 10:57:29 AM PDT
by
TrueBeliever9
(aut viam inveniam aut faciam)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson