Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clintonizing Kerry (shooting blanks)
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 4/9/04 | Op/Ed - CSM

Posted on 04/09/2004 10:48:14 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

(CSM) - Despite guns blazing in Iraq this week, John Kerry decided to focus on butter. In his second major campaign speech on the economy, the presumed Democratic nominee made promises about federal spending that indicate a President Kerry is likely to be more a Clinton than a Johnson; and on tax cuts, he'd be more a JFK than an FDR.

Kerry's speech was decidedly to the right for a Democrat, indicating he's rounded on his heels after the left-nudging primaries and run to the economic mainstream in time for the November election.

In his plan, he does President Bush one better by promising to cut the budget deficit by half within four years, a promise that has a read-my-lips certainty. But he conceded the Bush middle-class tax cuts are worth keeping, which would further stimulate the economy.

And Kerry defined the middle-class as those who earn up to $200,000. Anyone making more than that would not receive the cuts that Bush and Congress gave them and which might be extended. The anticipated revenue of Kerry's plan to tax the rich - perhaps close to $90 billion - would be used for health and education.

He thus joins a few other tax- cutting liberal presidents, such as John Kennedy, in stealing some GOP thunder. But it is in trying to achieve an austere budget that Kerry makes a novel contribution.

First, to halve the deficit, he had to renege on spending promises made during the primaries, such as immediate funding for universal preschool. Then, he has vowed to limit growth in spending to the rate of inflation for about 20 percent of the budget that's considered discretionary. If the economy keeps expanding, however, he'll have a hard time resisting political pressure for higher spending.

Like Clinton, Kerry plans to trim the bureaucracy through such steps as freezing federal travel and cutting outside contractors. That will require a vigilance few presidents have shown.

Kerry also endorses a lapsed congressional rule that any tax cuts be offset by new revenues or decreased spending. But he would let the middle-class tax cuts slip through that filter, undercutting the fiscal discipline that many in Congress are now trying to reinstate.

His speech provides enough details to dissipate a GOP charge that he's a tax-and-spend liberal. But the details don't clearly guarantee a reduced deficit. As the campaign continues, perhaps Kerry can fill in the blanks.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; clintonizing; kerry; kerryeconomics; shootingblanks

1 posted on 04/09/2004 10:48:14 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Why should anyone think that there's any connection between what Kerry is saying now and what he might do if he were in office?
2 posted on 04/09/2004 11:05:20 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Without your donations, Free Republic would be

Doomed!

Click the photo to see the FedEx ad. FedEx is not associated with Free Republic. It's just a darn cool ad.

And FR is a darn cool site. Please consider making a donation!.

3 posted on 04/09/2004 11:05:58 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Don't be a nuancy boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
(CSM) - Despite guns blazing in Iraq this week, John Kerry decided to focus on butter. In his second major campaign speech on the economy, the presumed Democratic nominee made promises about federal spending that indicate a President Kerry is likely to be more a Clinton than a Johnson; and on tax cuts, he'd be more a JFK than an FDR.

Kerry better do his homework, the real JFK cut taxed on......THE RICH!

4 posted on 04/09/2004 11:06:30 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Kennedy's tax cuts benefited the upper and upper middle classes even more. By the time Kennedy took office, the top income tax rate had reached 94%. Kennedy originally asked for it to be reduced to 65%, but Congress slashed this down to 70%. During a speech, JFK stated, "the current tax system exerts too heavy a drag on growth …reduces the financial incentives for personal effort, investment and risk taking." Without a question, it is mostly the middle and upper classes that undertake risky purchases and investment. As expected, the tax revenue from the top 1%, the top 5%, and top 20% surged as a result of income growth from the tax cuts. Tax revenue from the rich increased from almost 12% in 1963, to 15% by 1966.
5 posted on 04/09/2004 11:10:02 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I'm old. I'm young.

I'm rich. I'm poor.

I'm a northerner. I'm a southerner.

I fight against communism. I fight against those who fight against communism.

Taxes. No taxes.

Yes. No. Maybe so.
6 posted on 04/09/2004 11:10:07 AM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
CLINTONIZE Kerry?

Let's see, he's a former sixties anti-war radical, marriage of convenience, can't give a simple answer to a question flip-flopper, whose foreign policy is appease and apologize, and ask the UN's permission. NOW he's compared to Clinton?

7 posted on 04/09/2004 11:21:44 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Why should anyone think that there's any connection between what Kerry is saying now and what he might do if he were in office?

Why sould anyone think there is any connection between what he says today and what he has already done all his years in office?

8 posted on 04/09/2004 11:35:16 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
a President Kerry is likely to be more a Clinton than a Johnson ... more a JFK than an FDR.

In other words, hornier than a 3-balled tomcat

9 posted on 04/09/2004 10:45:31 PM PDT by RagingBull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RagingBull
Can too many injections of BULLtox ,, eerrrr, BillTox do that?

I don't think we can afford another Kerrennedy in the white house at this point and time in history.
10 posted on 04/09/2004 10:55:08 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Become a FR Monthly Donor ... Kerry thread archive @ /~normsrevenge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson