To: chance33_98
Woah! Quite a story. As sympathetic as I am to the non-gay rights activists I don't think they'll find the stats to prove that gay foster parents are more dangerous than non-gay foster parents. That is just my sad take on the situation.
5 posted on
04/09/2004 12:20:25 PM PDT by
jocon307
(The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
To: jocon307
11 posted on
04/09/2004 12:28:04 PM PDT by
DameAutour
(It's not Bush, it's the Congress.)
To: jocon307
I'm with you,there are bad gays and there are bad straights.
I doubt if there are statistics to prove gays are more dangerous to children than heterosexuals.
That said,this entire gay-straight discussion is getting very tedious. I live in Massachusetts and can't wait for the glee in the Boston Globe when May arrives and gay couples get "married".Should be interesting.
12 posted on
04/09/2004 12:28:24 PM PDT by
Mears
(The Killer Queen--caviar and cigarettes)
To: jocon307
I don't think they'll find the stats to prove that gay foster parents are more dangerous than non-gay foster parents. 80% of the cases involving sexual abuse by priests involved boys. That should provide a clue. The natural order is called the natural order for a reason.
32 posted on
04/09/2004 2:01:34 PM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson