Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My prodigal son, the homosexual
WorldNetDaily ^ | April 9, 2004 | Randall Terry

Posted on 04/09/2004 6:26:21 PM PDT by scripter

I am still in a state of shock; I have been grieving for days. My son, Jamiel Terry, was paid $5,000 by Out magazine (to appear April 20, 2004, on newsstands) to write a story about being Randall Terry's homosexual son. I pray my following words help other grieving parents and serve as a warning to moms and dads of small children to be unflinchingly and unashamedly diligent to protect their children from predators, and bring a reality check to those exploiting my son.

First of all, I love my son. Jamiel is incredibly gifted. He is articulate and handsome. He sings like an angel, he plays the piano, he's a great cook, and he's a great debater. He would make a powerful lawyer and a formidable politician. People like him. I love him. I've poured 16 years of my life into him.

In March of 1988, my then-wife and I took Jamiel in as a foster child when he was 8 years old. We also took in his baby sister (almost 3 years old)) and their older sister (12 years old). We adopted him and his younger sister when he was nearly 15 and she was 9. He came to us as a deeply troubled boy, from a very dark home. He was literally born in jail.

Tragically, by the time we got him as a foster child, he had already learned a lifestyle of deceit from his surroundings and had been a victim of crimes and treacheries that would mar him for life. I knew of some of those things when we got him and have learned more over the years. My hope was that by providing a loving, safe home, his life would be spared the path it would inevitably take if he remained in those surroundings. Unfortunately, my hopes and prayers were not realized.

My son's teen years became a mixed stream of happy times mingled with half-truths, dishonesty and a double life. His behavior grew worse and worse in college, culminating with the story in Out magazine.

For the uninformed, Out magazine specializes in bringing homosexuals "out of the closet." Out is committed to the homosexual agenda – homosexual marriage, special "civil rights" for homosexuals, promoting the fallacy that their sexual activities are normal and even laudable. Their agenda is shameless. My son was offered $5,000 to "write" a story about me and his life with me and my family. However, much of the story was written by Out's editor who put words in my son's mouth to accomplish the magazine's agenda.

For me, the most horrifying part of the story is my son's admission: "I did have numerous sexual encounters with my friends, usually during sleepovers at my parents' house" and "I was home from boarding school in my old bedroom at my parents' house in Windsor, N.Y., where my friend 'Johnny' and I had just finished fooling around ... we had been having sex for ages. ..."

I am so grieved and sorry for those boys and their parents. Those parents trusted us; they believed their sons were safe at our home – so had I. I was wrong. I still am in a state of shock. Please, parents, learn from this tragedy.

Frankly, so much of the story is inaccurate (times, dates, events) it would take too much space to correct it. But worse yet is that the picture the story paints of my son is based in fraud.

For example, the story states, "I was baptized Catholic and raised Protestant, and I later returned to the Roman Catholic Church." This is not true. Jamiel has never been confirmed; he does not believe in nor go to confession; he does not believe in many Catholic dogmas; He rejects papal authority and Catholic teaching on family issues.

The story states: "My father seems to believe that the fact that I'm an adopted child may help explain why I'm gay – not because of the adoption process itself but perhaps because of things that my have occurred before I was adopted at the age of 5." As I stated, Jamiel was adopted when he was nearly 15, not 5. To gloss over the tragic events and surroundings Jamiel was rescued from at age 8 is deceitful. (Social Services took the children because of prostitution, drugs and deeds committed against them.) Many homosexuals want to ignore the causal links to their sexual addiction; they want us to believe their homosexuality is genetic, not behavioral. They're "made this way."

The story stated, "My father is still trying to get me to go to a three-month retreat to be 'delivered' from homosexuality." This is also not true. Jamiel has repeatedly asked me to pay for him to go to "Love in Action," which offers sound clinical, in-patient therapy to those who want freedom – and they have a great success rate with homosexuals. Even after the article was done, he asked me to help. I have offered to pay for the in-patient care, and the offer still stands.

Probably the most painful part for me as a dad is that my son prostituted my name for $5,000: He sold out our family's privacy and private discussions for cold cash. Can you imagine a family member doing that to you?

He knows that the only reason Out, and now CNN, (and God knows who else before it's over) want to talk with him is because he's "Randall Terry's son." He knows he is going to get his 15 minutes of fame because he's the adopted son of a high profile Christian leader who has fought against homosexual marriage.

Adding pain to pain, he told CNN and a journalist from the Washington Post that he is no longer welcome in my home because he is a homosexual. That is not true. I have had him in my home for many days after knowing he was a homosexual.

But when I saw the Out article, I went to Charlotte, N.C., (where he is now) to tell him I love him, and how hurt I was that he betrayed our families privacy, and that he was not welcome in my home right now – not because of his homosexuality, but because he could sell us out again. At any point, he could come for a holiday, make mental notes and find another buyer for another story. I have a great wife, a teenage daughter and two small boys; I will not let that type of intrusion happen again.

My son is being paraded around as the latest homosexual "trophy" that had the guts to "come out." What they aren't telling you – and this grieves me to my core – is that by anyone's standard – homosexual or heterosexual – my son's life is in shambles. He was recently arrested for DWI; he is knowingly writing bad checks on a closed bank account; he dropped out of school; he doesn't have a job (and refuses to get one); he bounces from house to house living off other people; he's racked-up huge bills for friends and family that he cannot pay; he's been taken to court by former friends to get him to pay money he owed them; he's lied to his friends, telling them his "famous dad" was going to send him money to pay for his debts (I get calls or e-mails from college friends looking for money); he has "borrowed" money from countless numbers of my friends; he has a trail of wrecked friendships and family relationships because of deceit, money fraud and crossed boundaries – a mirror image of the home he was in from birth to 8.

I am a father in anguish; my son is a young man in crisis who needs intervention and therapy, not heady interviews with CNN. And Out magazine is despicable for their participation in a sham and exploiting my son for their own political agenda. If my son is their latest "hero," we should wonder how many more of their homosexual leaders and trophies that they present as "model citizens" have lives that are this unraveled.

Let all who read the Out story, or any other that spins off of it, know that the story about my son is laced with fraud and deceit from beginning to end. And please pray for my son's redemption, and pray for our family's healing.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: alankeyes; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; mediaslander; prisoners; randallterry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-225 next last
To: DoughtyOne
Like I said before, Terry left his family for a reason. Something wasn't right there or he wouldn't have left.

His wife was in her forties, and he met someone in her twenties.

THAT is what wasn't right in Randall Terry's home! Little head over big head.

Could you please explain in 100 words or less why the other kids didn't turn homosexual when Terry wasn't there why they needed him?

Have they declared their sexual proclivities?

I'll bet they're not too fond of their "dad."

81 posted on 04/09/2004 7:43:48 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: don-o
perhaps, old randy should have been paying more attention to his spouse and children instead of whoring around.
what a hypocrite. does he care more for the fetus than the living?
82 posted on 04/09/2004 7:43:50 PM PDT by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: scripter
I've always thought Randall Terry was a bit disturbed. I pity the poor son who had to grow up with him.

The next to last paragraph only serves to confirm that Randall Terry is a self-centered, vindictive, prideful man who would trash his own son and lay bare the most private and embarassing details of his son's life - something he complains that his son did to him.

This article strikes me a a tit-for-tat smear and a desperate attempt on Randall's part to get his version of the story out just to save his own face, at the expense of his son. Pitiful.

83 posted on 04/09/2004 7:44:33 PM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping + Very sad article.

The "Gay" activists and their supporters want only their own gratification and power, peoples' lives be damned.

If anyone wants on/off this pinglist, pingify me!

(I will be gone starting tomorrow AM until late Monday, so unless scripter or EdReform can do the pinging, you won't be getting Homsexual Agenda articles pung at you!)
84 posted on 04/09/2004 7:45:12 PM PDT by little jeremiah (...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Well I'll tell ya Sinkspur, I'm glad you were here to rip Terry to shreds.

I posted articles, from evangelical sites, which reveal Terry's recent actions.

He is NOT someone who should be casting stones.

85 posted on 04/09/2004 7:46:40 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
What you can't come to grips with, is that none of us is defending Terry from doing things that are clearly criminal in nature. What we are attempting to get you to explain, is what any of the 'stuff' you have posted on the forum has to do with his son's activity. Can you provide that or can't you?

Terry's other kids turned out just fine. Please tell us why you think your posts are important to this issue.

The subject was a homosexual son coming out for pay, going on CNN to talk about it. If you have something that pertains to that subject, why not offer it up.
86 posted on 04/09/2004 7:46:59 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Terry's a phony. He sends fundraising letters to former followers (like don-o) who remember him as he was, and not as he is today.

You been peeking into my mailbox, sink?

Nope, no begging letters here.

As I said, have no sympathy for folks who are duped by hucksters. But, also, have nothing but contempt for those who stayed in bed, with their wife, when the battle was joined.

Had the sleepers awoke, and joined us in jail.......

87 posted on 04/09/2004 7:49:06 PM PDT by don-o (Stop Freeploading. Do the right thing and sign up for a monthly donation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Terry, not interested in your warnings. And the internet is not the place for your family's dirty laundry. Get back to the basics - integrity and grace.
88 posted on 04/09/2004 7:49:17 PM PDT by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
I've never cared for his style and have never contributed to his cause. I don't know enough of Terry to say one way or the other.
89 posted on 04/09/2004 7:49:59 PM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Freepmail me the ping list and I'll see what I can do. I'll be working all weekend but at least I'll be online and may be able to ping folks.
90 posted on 04/09/2004 7:51:05 PM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Had the sleepers awoke, and joined us in jail.......

We'd have a criminal record.

And nothing else.

91 posted on 04/09/2004 7:52:00 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Sinkspur, even you aren't dumb enough to think a man shoud be unable to issue a short statement when his son goes on the national media circuit to defame him. You don't know what kind of a relationship Terry had with this kid. He may have kept in close contact over the years, and sent support payments every step of the way. Your publishing this 'stuff' is pointless. Nowhere in either article does it address the relationship between the father and son.

If this thread were about whether Terry's character was spotless or not, your posts would have been on topic. It wasn't.
92 posted on 04/09/2004 7:52:00 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You're really over the top on this thread. It was just over a month ago that when people took umbrage at your aggressive slap-downs you hid behind the weasel words, "Please, it's Lent." Apparently those words don't run very deep with you.
93 posted on 04/09/2004 7:52:49 PM PDT by Mmmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
We'd have a criminal record. And nothing else.

Well, I guess we can all be thankful that you were not a black man in Selma or Birmingham.

94 posted on 04/09/2004 7:54:13 PM PDT by don-o (Stop Freeploading. Do the right thing and sign up for a monthly donation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: millefleur
Your phrase "hate the sin but love the sinner" is not in the Bible.

Maybe not, but Jesus' own actions prove that it is central to Christian practice. While I'm nowhere near following that axiom to its necessary Christian extent, I do know that it is what we need to believe and practice.

95 posted on 04/09/2004 7:56:45 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater ("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: raynearhood
I am defending a man's right to respond to comments made in public about him. This is really rather elemental. Terry is responded to a situation that involves him intimately. Neither you, I or anyone outside of Terry and his son truly know the intimate details of their relationship.

I don't see Terry's comments as anything more than a brief clarification of how he views the current situation between him and his son.

Why is it that you think my supporting Terry's right to make a short statement is going to affect anything other than this one right?
96 posted on 04/09/2004 7:57:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
The kid is probably into drugs bigtime; the behavior (not homosexual) screams this fact.
97 posted on 04/09/2004 7:57:19 PM PDT by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
i wouldn't worry about my child going on CNN.truth is terry is a judgmental hypocrite who probably neglected his children as well as his wife.

what a repulsive little man.
98 posted on 04/09/2004 7:57:27 PM PDT by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: millefleur
Yes, we are to condemn sinful activity, but sinful activity does not define the entirety of a man. We are also called to love all men in the Bible. The Bible calls us both to condemn sin and to love all men. Therefore, as Christians we have to make distinctions and draw lines. To hate the sinner as well as the sin is just as unChristian as to love the sin and the sinner.
99 posted on 04/09/2004 7:59:18 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Please name the woman who was in here twenties. Thanks.

BTW, how do you know what Terry's relationship is with his kids? Tell us when he saw them last. Thanks in advance.
100 posted on 04/09/2004 7:59:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson