Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Let me try to explain. Defending Randall Terry by getting behind him and his response to his sons article may do more harm than good when trying to fight the homosexual agenda. His character is flawed. Although that may not mean much when it comes to libs it means alot to conservatives. And the left knows it. They will attack character like Rosie O. attacks a cheeseburger. If they could they would make Terry look evil, liken everyone who thinks gay marriage is wrong to him, and shift opinion.
67 posted on 04/09/2004 7:27:01 PM PDT by raynearhood (how many licks does it take to get to the Tootsie-Roll center of a Tootsie-Pop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: raynearhood
I am defending a man's right to respond to comments made in public about him. This is really rather elemental. Terry is responded to a situation that involves him intimately. Neither you, I or anyone outside of Terry and his son truly know the intimate details of their relationship.

I don't see Terry's comments as anything more than a brief clarification of how he views the current situation between him and his son.

Why is it that you think my supporting Terry's right to make a short statement is going to affect anything other than this one right?
96 posted on 04/09/2004 7:57:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson