To: DoughtyOne; don-o
Tell me what motivates you to post this stuff? If has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. It has everything to do with the man who is "anguishing" over his homosexual son.
Terry's a phony. He sends fundraising letters to former followers (like don-o) who remember him as he was, and not as he is today.
What on earth would possess a man to solicit funds from gullible people to pay for a half-million dollar house for him and his new squeeze?
Randall Terry should find another line of work. Attempting to inspire people to his side through the veil of morality is the height of hypocrisy.
77 posted on
04/09/2004 7:38:45 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: sinkspur
What you can't come to grips with, is that none of us is defending Terry from doing things that are clearly criminal in nature. What we are attempting to get you to explain, is what any of the 'stuff' you have posted on the forum has to do with his son's activity. Can you provide that or can't you?
Terry's other kids turned out just fine. Please tell us why you think your posts are important to this issue.
The subject was a homosexual son coming out for pay, going on CNN to talk about it. If you have something that pertains to that subject, why not offer it up.
To: sinkspur
Terry's a phony. He sends fundraising letters to former followers (like don-o) who remember him as he was, and not as he is today. You been peeking into my mailbox, sink?
Nope, no begging letters here.
As I said, have no sympathy for folks who are duped by hucksters. But, also, have nothing but contempt for those who stayed in bed, with their wife, when the battle was joined.
Had the sleepers awoke, and joined us in jail.......
87 posted on
04/09/2004 7:49:06 PM PDT by
don-o
(Stop Freeploading. Do the right thing and sign up for a monthly donation.)
To: sinkspur
Sinkspur, even you aren't dumb enough to think a man shoud be unable to issue a short statement when his son goes on the national media circuit to defame him. You don't know what kind of a relationship Terry had with this kid. He may have kept in close contact over the years, and sent support payments every step of the way. Your publishing this 'stuff' is pointless. Nowhere in either article does it address the relationship between the father and son.
If this thread were about whether Terry's character was spotless or not, your posts would have been on topic. It wasn't.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson