Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanMade1776
MR. PETERSON: Let’s move to another subject. (Laughter.)

There’s a lot of talk about how we ought to take on Iraq, and that we think they’ve got biological weapons, and we think that they have them weaponized, and they may have nuclear materials. But what’s less clear to me is what we mean exactly by “taking on Iraq,” particularly if they don't do anything overt; particularly if we don’t demonstrate that they were involved in September 11th.

So can you give me some scenarios that you think are sensible, that put some meat on the bones of how we’re going to take on Iraq? What do we mean by this?

MR. KERREY: Invade Iraq and liberate 24 million Iraqis. That’s what I’d do.

http://www.concordcoalition.org/home/01dinnerpanel.htm
3 posted on 04/10/2004 1:20:57 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanMade1776
MR. KERREY: Invade Iraq and liberate 24 million Iraqis. That’s what I’d do.

THE WEASEL SPEAKS!

Let's not let this slime ball forget it!

Why are Dem dumb butts such "effing s==theels"?

10 posted on 04/10/2004 4:12:35 PM PDT by VOYAGER (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson