Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interesting Articles From Summer 2001
Many ^

Posted on 04/12/2004 8:58:32 PM PDT by rocklobster11

Here are some interesting articles relating to the Administrations concern about attacks prior to 9-11.

U.S. Forces in Gulf On Highest Alert
Threat scrambles U.S. troops, ships in Mideast
Rumsfeld: 'U.S. vulnerable to emerging threats'
Bin Laden readying to hit US, Israeli interests
Terror, Iran and the U.S.

U.S. Forces in Gulf On Highest Alert Threats Also Prompt Travel Warning

By Vernon Loeb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 23, 2001; Page A22
http://washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A35929-2001Jun22?language=printer

The Pentagon has put all U.S. military forces in the Persian Gulf on the highest state of alert and ordered ships from the 5th Fleet in Bahrain out to sea because of increased terrorist threats linked to Osama bin Laden, U.S. officials said yesterday.

News of the threats, which a senior official called credible but "non-specific," sent stocks tumbling on Wall Street.

The Pentagon ordered all forces in the Persian Gulf on "Threat Condition Delta" late Thursday night after U.S. intelligence agencies detected increased surveillance activity and movement throughout the region by individuals associated with al Qaeda, bin Laden's network of Islamic extremists, the official said.

The signs of a possible terrorist attack are not thought to be related to Thursday's federal indictment of 14 suspects in the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, the official added.

"We don't have a geographic focus, and we don't have a date" for an attack, the official said. "We just have an angst."

A new bin Laden videotape circulating in the Middle East is reminiscent of propaganda that preceded the bombing of two U.S. embassies in East Africa in 1998, according to the official.

Bin Laden, an exiled Saudi millionaire who has taken refuge in Afghanistan, appears in the video wearing a traditional Yemeni dagger and reciting a poem in which he refers to the suicide bombing of the destroyer USS Cole in the Yemeni port of Aden in October.

Without claiming credit for the bombing, bin Laden says: "And in Aden, they charged and destroyed a destroyer that fearsome people fear, one that evokes horror when it docks and when it sails."

U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf have gone on heightened alert several times since the Cole bombing, which killed 17 sailors. Most recently, they moved to "Threat Condition Charlie," the second-highest state of alert, on May 29 because of intelligence reports of increased terrorist threats.

Under a Delta alert, access to U.S. military facilities is severely restricted. All vehicles entering bases are stopped, and many are searched; shore leaves and other non-business visits are canceled; packages and supplies are carefully inspected; patrols are increased, and troops are urged to be vigilant.

Retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni, who until last year was commander of U.S. forces in the Mideast, said yesterday that "the mood out there isn't good. I've not seen it worse."

The State Department, meanwhile, reissued a worldwide caution for Americans traveling abroad, warning they "may be at increased risk of a terrorist action from extremist groups." The global advisory was last updated May 29 after four al Qaeda operatives were convicted of conspiracy in the embassy bombings, which killed 224 people and wounded 4,600 in Kenya and Tanzania.

State Department security officials also closed the U.S. Embassy in Dakar, Senegal, early yesterday so that security precautions could be reviewed. The embassy in Manama, Bahrain, will be closed today for a similar review.

At the port in Manama, Navy minesweepers were sent to sea yesterday as a precaution against terrorist attack. The aircraft carrier USS Constellation and its battle group were already at sea.

A contingent of 2,200 Marines also cut short a training exercise yesterday in Jordan and left the country on three ships led by the USS Boxer.

Staff writer Thomas E. Ricks contributed to this report.

----

Threat scrambles U.S. troops, ships in Mideast

06/23/2001
USA Today
The Associated Press.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/june01/2001-06-22-us-persiangulf.htm

WASHINGTON (AP) - In response to a threat against Americans in the Middle East, a Marine Corps training exercise in Jordan has been cut short and Navy ships have been ordered out of port in Bahrain, Pentagon officials said Friday. The threat was described by the officials as "non-specific," meaning it was aimed at Americans but not necessarily against members of the military.

At the same time, the State Department said the U.S. government has learned that American citizens and interests abroad may be at risk of a terrorist attack from extremist groups,

A "worldwide caution" urged U.S. citizens to maintain a high level of vigilance and to take appropriate steps to increase security awareness to reduce their vulnerability.

Officials said it was possible the threat against Americans in the Middle East was related to Thursday's announcement by the Justice Department of indictments against 13 Saudis and one Lebanese in connection with the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers apartment complex in Saudi Arabia. Nineteen members of the U.S. Air Force were killed in that attack.

It was not immediately clear whether the source of the new threat was known to U.S. officials.

In response to the threat, several Navy minesweeping ships were ordered out of port in Bahrain, which is headquarters for the U.S. 5th Fleet that patrols the Persian Gulf area. The aircraft carrier USS Constellation and her battle group already were at sea, officials said.

Other additional security measures also were taken, but the officials would not disclose details.

The level of security for U.S. forces in the Middle East - known as the "threatcon" - was raised a notch, the officials said. They would not be more specific.

A contingent of 2,200 Marines operating as an Amphibious Ready Group cut short training in Jordan, the officials said. The Marines of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit from Camp Pendleton, Calif., were being taken back aboard their three ships, led by the USS Boxer, an amphibious assault ship.

U.S. Embassy officials in Amman were not immediately available for comment. Jordanian government officials confirmed a joint military exercise with U.S. Marines was suspended indefinitely.

Extra security precautions for U.S. forces in the Middle East have been ordered several times since the bombing last October of the USS Cole in Yemen.

------

Rumsfeld: 'U.S. vulnerable to emerging threats'

06/22/2001
USA TODAY
http://usatoday.com/news/washdc/2001-06-22-rumsfeld.htm

WASHINGTON (AP) - The "two war" strategy that has underpinned U.S. military planning for the past decade has outlived its usefulness, leaving the United States increasingly vulnerable to emerging threats like ballistic missiles and cyberattack, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told Congress.

"The current strategy is not working, so we owe it to ourselves to ask: What might be better?" Rumsfeld said.

He spoke before the Senate Armed Services Committee and later the House Armed Services Committee. It marked Rumsfeld's first public congressional testimony since he took office in January. Some in Congress have complained that Rumsfeld was keeping them in the dark, although several committee members applauded him Thursday for undertaking an in-depth review of defense needs.

The U.S. defense strategy, fashioned in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union, is based on a capability to win two "major theater wars" - on the scale of the 1991 Gulf War - at nearly the same time. The idea is to have enough combat forces to sustain a conflict in the Persian Gulf, with enough in reserve to dissuade North Korea, for example, from starting a conflict with South Korea.

Rumsfeld said this approach worked well during the 1990s but has been undermined by a lack of investment in the advanced military technologies needed to meet emerging threats. He also said the Pentagon had "skimped on our people, doing harm to their trust and confidence."

Rumsfeld said the Defense Department has sketched the general outlines of a new defense strategy and hopes to present it to the White House for President Bush's approval by late summer. It is being closely examined now by a civilian-military team of experts as part of a broad defense review, he said.

Rumsfeld also told the committees that the administration hopes to have an amended 2002 defense budget request ready for Congress by Wednesday. He provided no figures.

He described the emerging new defense strategy in broad terms, with the barest of detail. He said it would emphasize being prepared for future threats while defending the United States against current threats like terrorism and nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

It also would enable the United States to maintain forces abroad capable of defeating any adversary, repelling attacks in "a number of critical areas," and conducting a limited number of smaller-scale military missions.

He said the new strategy could require modifications in war plans, but did not elaborate.

Underlying the Bush administration's push for a new defense strategy is the president's belief - shared by Rumsfeld - that the existing approach has put too much strain on the troops and emphasized near-term threats like war on the Korean peninsula at the expense of emerging threats like cyberwar.

Evidence of the difficulties in finding an alternative emerged in Thursday's exchange with members of the House Armed Services Committee.

Rep. Floyd Spence, R-S.C., told Rumsfeld he thought it was premature to drop the current approach because it serves an important purpose in dissuading potentially hostile nations from thinking that they could catch the United States short if it became involved in a war in the Gulf.

"If we change it we confuse a lot of people - friends and allies," Spence said.

Rumsfeld said he fears the United States has become complacent about defense, since the Cold War is over, the U.S. economy is strong and the country faces no immediate threat to its existence.

To illustrate his point he told the story of a Union general who surveyed his Confederate adversary across the battlefield and, confident in his superior position, turned to an aide and said, "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance." A moment later a sharpshooter's bullet struck him under his left eye, killing him instantly.

"Complacency can kill," Rumsfeld said.


-------- terrorism

Bin Laden readying to hit US, Israeli interests: TV

June 23
AFP
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/010623/1/15d48.html

DUBAI, Fighters Saudi-born extremist Osama bin Laden are preparing to hit US and Israeli interests around the world, the Arab television channel, the Middle East Broadcasting Centre (MBC) said Saturday.

"I met with bin Laden near Kandahar (Afghanistan) over the last few days and his main supporters said in front of him that there will be a big surprise over the next two weeks," the MBC correspondent said.

Among the bin Laden supporters quoted were Abu Hafs, considered as bin Laden's right-hand man, and Ayman al-Zawahirit, the leader of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

The United States on Friday ordered its war fleet in the Gulf to put to sea because of credible threats of terrorist actions, and published a worldwide warning for US citizens travelling abroad.

Washington holds Bin Laden responsible for the 1998 bombings of its embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, which killed more than 200 people.

----

Terror, Iran and the U.S.

New York Times
June 23, 2001
By JAMES RISEN and JANE PERLEZ
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/23/world/23TERR.html?searchpv=nytToday

WASHINGTON, June 22 - The United States has never known quite what to do about Iran's role in anti- American terrorism. From the embassy bombings and hostage taking in Lebanon during the early 1980's to the Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia in 1996, Washington's response to evidence that Tehran was sponsoring violence against American interests has been marked by deep ambivalence and contorted internal debates among several generations of policy makers.

To critics who advocate a harder line toward Iran, the government's indictment of 13 Saudis and a Lebanese in the Khobar Towers bombing, handed down Thursday, just short of Monday's five-year anniversary of the attack, once again revealed an American reluctance to tackle Tehran head-on on state-sponsored terrorism. United States officials have said they have evidence of Iranian involvement, and at a news conference announcing the indictment, Attorney General John Ashcroft charged that Iranian officials "inspired, supported and supervised members of Saudi Hezbollah" in the attack. But prosecutors stopped short of bringing charges against any individual Iranian officials.

"Why haven't we been more forward leaning on Iran?" asked one former United States official familiar with the long debate in the government over the Khobar Towers case. "The intelligence on Iran is pretty strong, and they could have named names of Iranian officials."

But even Thursday's rather limited indictment has stirred up a hornet's nest in the volatile Persian Gulf region, as Iran denied any role in the bombing and Saudi Arabia disputed American jurisdiction in the case. That underscored the difficult balancing act American policy makers confront whenever dealing with Iran on the issue of terrorism.

For diplomatic and economic reasons, Washington has declined to lean heavily on Saudi Arabia either to extradite suspects it holds in the bombing attack that killed 19 American servicemen and wounded 372 others, or to crack down on the Saudi branch of Hezbollah.

In addition, Pentagon officials said today that American forces in the gulf region had been placed on heightened alert because of the threat of a terrorist attack against United States interests in the region.

As a result of the alert, six Navy ships stationed in Bahrain - four mine sweepers, a supply ship and a destroyer - have been put to sea, joining the Constellation carrier battle group that was already deployed in the region. A Marine exercise in Jordan was cut short, and security has been tightened at bases and ports used by American forces in the region, officials said.

Officials speculated that the threat might be related to the Khobar Towers indictment, and might involve groups related to Osama bin Laden, the Saudi exile who has been charged by the United States with leading the conspiracy to blow up two American embassies in East Africa in 1998.

The Clinton administration was widely criticized for its failure to pursue evidence that Iran was behind the bombing, but now, the Bush administration has shown that same reluctance. Prosecutors did not cite Iranian officials by name despite what some officials said was the hope of Louis J. Freeh, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, that Iranian officials would be charged. Mr. Freeh, who had taken a personal interest in the case, said on Thursday that it would remain open, and Mr. Ashcroft made it clear that the United States would be willing to pursue charges against Iranian officials if more evidence emerged.

One United States official said today that while there was information pointing to Iranian involvement, "that's a long way from being able to make a case in court."

The United States has often been willing to punish lesser nations when they step over the line into support for terrorist acts, often with less evidence of their involvement in specific acts than was the case with the Khobar Towers bombing. The United States bombed Libya in 1986 after it linked it to the bombing of a Berlin nightclub that killed American soldiers. The Clinton administration launched missile strikes against Afghanistan and Sudan in 1998 after the embassy bombings in East Africa. Yet, several administrations have hesitated to retaliate against Iran.

The Khobar Towers case has been complicated by the fact that the attack occurred on the soil of one of America's most important allies in the region, Saudi Arabia, and that most of those suspected of direct involvement are Saudi citizens.

On Friday, Saudi officials complained publicly about the indictment, arguing that the United States had no right to bring a legal case over an incident that occurred in Saudi Arabia. The defense minister, Prince Sultan bin Abdel Aziz, said legal steps in the case "fall within the jurisdiction of Saudi Arabia."

Iran, meanwhile, denied any role in the Khobar bombing. A Foreign Ministry spokesman, Hamid Reza Assei, said today that the "U.S. judiciary has leveled charges against Iran which have no legal and judicial basis," the Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

Early on, the United States approached the incident almost purely as a law enforcement matter, in contrast to the way the government responded to the East Africa embassy bombings two years later. After those, the United States quickly retaliated with cruise missile strikes against Afghanistan and Sudan, in an effort to punish Mr. bin Laden and his network. Only later did Washington seek indictments against Mr. bin Laden and others in his organization.

"We chose law enforcement retaliation versus military retaliation," the former Clinton administration official said. The Khobar investigation, however, bogged down in turf battles between the F.B.I. and the Saudis. The bureau complained of a lack of cooperation from the Saudi authorities, while the Saudis privately began to complain that the Clinton administration did not seem interested in hearing about evidence that Iran was behind the attack.

Ultimately, American officials said cooperation improved, and the Saudis are believed to have provided much of the evidence that led to the indictments.

By 1999, the evidence linking Iran to the bombing was strong enough so that President Clinton sent a secret letter to Iran's president, Mohammad Khatami, asking for help in solving the Khobar case. The letter was sent after the United States obtained convincing information that Iranian officials were behind the attack. The letter came in the midst of Mr. Clinton's broader efforts to reach out to Mr. Khatami and engage the reformist forces in Iran.

But the Iranians refused to help on the case. Mr. Freeh reportedly concluded that the Clinton administration was not serious about solving the case, and he is said to have waited until Mr. Clinton left office in order to try to bring charges in the matter. The indictment came in Mr. Freeh's last week in office as F.B.I. director.

"I'm disappointed that they didn't name the Iranians," said Fran Heiser, of Palm Coast, Fla., the mother of one of the bombing victims. "There has been so much talk around and around it. I hope they have a reasonable answer."

--------


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; binladen; bushknew; sept10; threatlevels

1 posted on 04/12/2004 8:58:32 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
My Navy nephew's ship was almost constantly on high alert during summer prior to 911. We were expecting to get hit abroad. Terror issue was serious in the military.
2 posted on 04/12/2004 9:07:41 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
Here's another article from May 2001
Bush to Create New Terrorism Office

New York Times
May 4, 2001
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Bush-Terrorism.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush has drafted an executive order that would create an umbrella office on terrorism to coordinate the government's response to any biological, chemical or nuclear attack, a congressional source familiar with the plan said Friday night.

The office would exist under the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Vice President Dick Cheney would oversee the creation of a national terrorism response plan, the source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The office would be at the helm of more than 40 federal agencies that provide emergency services and personnel.

Currently, the Justice Department has responsibility for reacting to a terrorist attack.

White House officials declined to comment on draft order, first reported by NBC News.

Bush's plan is separate from legislative efforts in Congress to reorganize the nation's anti-terrorism response. The Senate Intelligence Committee is holding hearings on the matter next week. Several emergency management agencies will testify.

Andrea Andrews, a spokeswoman for Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said the president's plan is a ``step in the right direction.''

``There is a consensus that something that needs to be done to coordinate all the agencies that have jurisdiction in this area,'' Andrews said.

The federal government has received several indicators that the nation is not prepared to deal with the calamity created by a terrorist attack.

Last spring, a secret exercise to determine how a medium-sized city would cope after a terrorist detonation of a weapon of mass destruction showed that Cincinnati's hospitals, police and other services were woefully unprepared for such an attack.

The findings were presented to then-Attorney General Janet Reno, then- Deputy Defense Secretary John Hamre and senior FBI officials at two sessions at the Pentagon. They immediately ordered the formation of interagency working groups to study the problems that might arise from a major terrorist attack.

The resulting study and other government studies suggested that the nation's emergency groups were too splintered to respond to a problem quickly.

Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Friday that the nation's cities would be overwhelmed by the probable injuries.

``Supposing someone used one of these things (bio-weapon) and we required hospitalization of 1,000 people, what community has got the ability to put together quickly the medical teams, the other equipment needed to take care of 1,000 people?,'' Warner said at a meeting Friday.

``We are unprepared, and we are determined here in the Senate to bring together, all of us, put our minds to work with those in the administration and see what we can do to prepare America.''


--------
3 posted on 04/12/2004 9:17:19 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Notice how that one article has usama promising a "surprise" in 2 weeks. More like 2+ months.
4 posted on 04/12/2004 9:30:22 PM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Thanks, I remember this.
5 posted on 04/12/2004 9:30:46 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11; MAF
From my archive dated 12/26/1999


6 posted on 04/12/2004 9:33:24 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
BTTT
7 posted on 04/12/2004 9:36:58 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Great post bump!
8 posted on 04/12/2004 9:41:26 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
Here's a few more:

----

Searching for Bin Laden

Wednesday May 30
By ABCNEWS.com
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/abc/20010530/ts/binladen_010529_1.html

U.S. commandos have been inside Afghanistan (news - web sites), ready to seize Osama bin Laden (news - web sites), but were called off at the last moment.

The U.S. government set up several secret commando missions to capture Osama bin Laden, only to call them off at the last minute, U.S. military and intelligence sources have told ABCNEWS.

The commando missions were arranged by teams assembled by the CIA (news - web sites) and the Defense Department, but abandoned because people in charge were not comfortable with the risks, sources say.

Some of the commando team members have already been inside Afghanistan, where bin Laden has lived since 1996. Other teams are on several hours' notice to try again, the sources say.

A commando operation to capture bin Laden would entail much higher risks. American commandos could be killed or captured, and any botched raid would only add to bin Laden's mystique, U.S. officials say.

U.S. officials accuse the exiled Saudi dissident of masterminding the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 and want him to stand trial. Four of his followers were convicted in the case Tuesday, but bin Laden and numerous other defendants are still at large. The bombings killed 224 people, including 12 Americans.

The United States targeted bin Laden three years ago, soon after the bombings. U.S. warships in the Arabian Sea fired cruise missiles at a suspected bin Laden training camp in Afghanistan.

A Hard Man to Find

The U.S. government spends hundreds of millions of dollars each year trying to learn every detail of bin Laden's life, using satellites and a network of informers. For years, the United States has been waiting for him to make a mistake.

"We have people that track him all the time and know him probably better than his wives know him," says Jeff Ellis, a former commando who participated in several secret missions to capture terrorists overseas.

"If there's an opportunity to grab this guy, the government, unless they've changed, will go after him," says Ellis, who now works for Research Planning Inc., a private sector company based in Falls Church, Va.

But bin Laden has proven to be an extremely difficult target, sources say.

He has stopped using easy-to-trace satellite phones. He disguises his travel by using beaten-up old trucks or cars, sleeps in a different place every night and often changes his plans at the last minute. He is heavily guarded.

"He'll have people that will sit down there and work him through where he gets his food, how he gets his food, where he sleeps that night, how they're going to move him. It's just like the Secret Service protecting our president," says Ellis.

"The kind of detailed knowledge we need about his immediate movements, his everyday activities and his current location at any given time are very difficult to come up with," says retired Lt. Gen. Patrick Hughes, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. "Without knowing where he is going to be, chances are you won't apprehend him."

In the 1998 airstrike, the cruise missiles hit the camp just two hours after bin Laden's departure, U.S. sources say.

"The problem is, if one is going to contemplate a strike on him ... one needs absolutely perfect information. Not only now but where he will be in the next hour or two," says Ken Katzman, a former CIA analyst who now works for the Congressional Research Service.

----

U.S. Still Hopes to Nab bin Laden

New York Times
May 30, 2001
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-US-Osama-bin-Laden.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration hasn't given up on capturing Osama bin Laden, the exiled Saudi accused of masterminding terrorism, now isolated in Afghanistan with a $5 million bounty on his head.

While hailing the convictions of four followers of bin Laden in New York, U.S. officials and private analysts acknowledge that a long and difficult road lies ahead before victory can be proclaimed over bin Laden.

State Department spokesman Philip Reeker said Wednesday the United States remains ``committed to seeing justice done.''

``Mr. bin Laden should be delivered to a country where he can be brought to justice,'' Reeker said. He said strict U.N. sanctions against the Islamic Taliban regime, which controls Afghanistan and considers bin Laden a persecuted holy warrior, demonstrates the global opposition to sheltering him.

U.S. officials acknowledged that Pakistan, a Cold War ally and Afghanistan's eastern neighbor, has been an obstacle to fulfilling of U.S. policy goals. They said Pakistan continues to supply weapons to the Taliban in defiance of a U.N. Security Council resolution.

Vincent Cannistraro, a former CIA chief of counterterrorism operations, called Tuesday's convictions in a New York court a modest victory but said there are ``hundreds and hundreds more like them who will take their place.''

On Tuesday, a Manhattan federal court jury convicted the four allies of bin Laden for their roles in the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998 that killed 228 people.

As for bin Laden, Cannistraro said, ``We don't have him on the run. He's still able to do about one major operation a year.''

A U.S. official who follows terrorism said the convictions marked a breakthrough but added the threat has not abated.

Hours after the convictions were announced, the State Department urged overseas Americans to maintain high vigilance and to increase their security awareness.

The statement was a reaffirmation of a warning issued three weeks ago, after the trial began.

The CIA would not comment on the verdict but said testimony on bin Laden last February by CIA Director George Tenet remains valid.

At the time, Tenet said bin Laden had declared all U.S. citizens legitimate targets of attack and demonstrated a capability to plan ``multiple attacks with little or no warning.''

The Bush administration is reviewing the policy for dealing with bin Laden that it inherited from the Clinton administration. The State Department is offering a reward of up to $5 million for information leading to bin Laden's capture.

As evidence of international opposition to the Taliban, the U.N. Security Council has imposed sanctions twice over the past two years.

Nevertheless, the Taliban vowed Wednesday never to hand over bin Laden.

``He is a great holy warrior of Islam and a great benefactor of the Afghan people,'' said Abdul Anan Himat, a senior official at the Taliban information ministry.

The Afghan problem is one of the few issues on which the United States and Russia agree. Russia believes bin Laden is using Afghanistan as a base to foment Islamic fundamentalist uprisings in Chechnya as well as several of the former Soviet republics, including Uzbekistan.

U.S. and Russian officials have met several times on the issue, including last week at the State Department. The department said the two sides agreed ``to review specific steps to counter the threats from terrorism and narcotics production emanating from Afghan territory.''

Cannistraro said Russia, along with Iran and India, has been supporting an anti-Taliban resistance group in Northern Afghanistan, and he urged the Bush administration to adopt the same policy. It is not clear whether the administration is considering that option.

The most dramatic U.S. attempt to do away with bin Laden occurred in August 1998 when President Clinton ordered cruise missile strikes against bin Laden's suspected hide-out. The missiles landed wide of the mark.

Barnett Rubin, of New York University's Center for International Cooperation, recommended that the United States offer a large package of reconstruction aid to the Taliban in return for a change in behavior.

He said he was not confident the proposal would be accepted by the Afghans, but the mere offer could encourage Taliban moderates to challenge the rule of the hard-line faction now in charge.

9 posted on 04/12/2004 9:47:24 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Legally boarded Muslim passengers with legal razor blades utilized within a device that held the razor blade away from the hand of the razor blade wielder weren't the concern because normal people don't imagine the scenario.

Al Qaeda employs "behavioral scientists" just as the Demonicrats do and came to the strategic realization that it would work based on anticipating hijacked passengers actions to the plan. That expected action was that everyone would just sit back and appease the hijackers.
10 posted on 04/12/2004 9:48:27 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
I remember this alert distinctly 3 days prior to 9/11. I heard it on KFWB...and it was the first thing I thought of when I first saw the WTC.

http://ww2.pstripes.osd.mil/01/sep01/ed090901a.html
11 posted on 04/12/2004 9:54:11 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Was this one of the jobs Clarke wanted and didn't get ..??
12 posted on 04/12/2004 9:56:16 PM PDT by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Taliban invalidates bin Laden's orders

June 18, 2001
By Arnaud de Borchgrave
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20010618-38746756.htm

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan -- Any holy decree or "fatwa" issued by Osama bin Laden declaring holy war against the United States and ordering Muslims to kill Americans is "null and void," according to the Taliban´s supreme leader.

Bin Laden, America´s most wanted terror suspect, "is not entitled to issue fatwas as he did not complete the mandatory 12 years of Quranic studies to qualify for the position of mufti," said Mullah Mohammad Omar Akhund, known to every Afghan as amir-ul-mumineen (supreme leader of the faithful).

Mullah Omar made clear that the Islamic Emirate, as the Taliban regime calls itself, would like to "resolve or dissolve" the bin Laden issue. In return, he expects the United States to establish a dialogue that would lead to "an easing and then lifting of U.N. sanctions that are strangling and killing the people of the Emirate."

The two issues are linked, both in Washington and in Kandahar, the nation´s sprawling, dust-choked religious center of 750,000 people where Mullah Omar and his 10-man ruling Shura, or council, have their headquarters.

Mullah Omar, 41, is a soft-spoken man of very few words. He relies on Rahmatullah Hashimi, a 24-year-old multilingual "ambassador-at-large," rumored to be Afghanistan´s next foreign minister, to translate and expand his short, staccato statements.

The one-eyed, 6-foot-6-inch, five-times wounded veteran of the war against the Soviet occupation in the 1980s was also the architect of the Taliban´s victory over the multiple warring factions that followed the Soviet withdrawal in 1989.

Sitting cross-legged on the carpeted mud floor of his spartan adobe house on the west end of town, Mullah Omar´s shrapnel-scarred face, topped by a black turban, shows no emotion as he answers in quick succession a military field telephone, walkie-talkies and a wideband radio.

"We´re still fighting a war," he says impatiently, referring to Ahmed Shah Masood´s guerrilla forces, which still hold 10 percent of Afghan territory in the northeastern part of the country.

According to U.S. intelligence reports, bin Laden has issued instructions that his followers have described as fatwas. But Mullah Omar said, "Only muftis can issue fatwas." Bin Laden "is not a mufti, and therefore any fatwas he may have issued are illegal and null and void."

The Afghan supreme leader also said bin Laden is not allowed any contact with the media or with foreign government representatives.

Afghanistan, according to the amir, has suggested to the United States and to the United Nations that international "monitors" keep bin Laden under observation pending a resolution of the case, "but so far we have received no reply."

Mr. Hashimi, in flawless English, added: "We also notified the United States we were putting bin Laden on trial last September for his alleged crimes and requested that relevant evidence be presented."

He said the court sat for 40 days, but the United States never presented any evidence of suspected crimes by bin Laden, including his suspected involvement in the bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa, which Mullah Omar agreed were "criminal acts."

"Bin Laden, for his part, swore on the Quran he had nothing to do with those terrorist bombings and that he is not responsible for what others do who claim to know him," Mr. Hashimi said.

On Tuesday, a New York court sentenced one Saudi Arabian to life in prison in connection with the embassy bomb attacks; three more men -- a Tanzanian, a U.S. citizen and a Jordanian -- have also been found guilty and are awaiting sentencing. All claimed to have been acting on orders from bin Laden.

In March, Pakistani leader Gen. Pervez Musharraf told The Washington Times that by demonizing bin Laden, the United States had turned him into a cult figure among Muslim masses and "a hero among Islamist extremists."

Since then, the State Department has played down the importance of bin Laden. Mullah Omar clearly wishes to do the same. But politically, he cannot afford to deport him lest he arouse the wrath of his fellow extremists.

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are the only three countries that recognize the Taliban government. Saudi Arabia and the UAE secretly fund the Taliban by paying Pakistan for its logistical support to Afghanistan.

Mr. Hashemi, a highly intelligent high school dropout who toured the United States earlier this year, fielded other questions that Mullah Omar felt had been answered in recent months:

• On the lack of schools for girls: "We don´t even have enough schools for boys. Everything was destroyed in 20 years of fighting. The sooner U.N. sanctions are lifted, the sooner we can finish building schools for both boys and girls."

• On the treatment of women: "You forget that America and the rest of the world are centuries ahead of us. If you introduced your manners and mores suddenly in Afghanistan, society would implode and anarchy would ensue. We don´t interfere with what we consider your decadent lifestyle, so please refrain from interfering with ours."

• On the destruction of TV sets: "Try to imagine what would have happened in 18th- or even 19th-century America or Europe with the overnight introduction of television and all the sex that is now part of programs everywhere except Iran. We are not against television, but against the filth that pollutes the airwaves."

• Distributed by United Press International.

----
13 posted on 04/12/2004 10:10:37 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Here's an interesting one. Note the highlighted info about Neo-Nazi's flying remote controlled miniature planes into the G8 summit, and how Time makes fun of it. Not quite what I've been lead to believe about terrorists flying airliners into the G8 summit

Bin Laden Rides Again: Myth vs. Reality
A 'plot' to assassinate President Bush and a second to attack the U.S. military in the Gulf -all in the same week.

TIME.com
BY TONY KARON
Wednesday, Jun. 20, 2001
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,131866,00.html

That It Boy of international terror, Osama Bin Laden, is back in the news. Headlines from just the past week: "Russians Reveal Bin Laden Plot to Kill Bush at G8 Meeting." "Bin Laden Video Claims Responsibility for Cole Bombing." "Yemen Foils Bin Laden Plot to Kill U.S. Investigators." "Bin Laden Group Planned to Blow Up U.S. Embassy in India..." And finally, at week's end, U.S. forces all over the Gulf confined to barracks and ships put to sea because of a "non-specific but credible threat" from Bin Laden's group. Vile acts and wretched conspiracies reported from all over the world, all carrying the imprimatur of the Saudi terror tycoon skulking in the hills of Afghanistan, his name now the globally recognizable shorthand for Islamist terror in the same way that "Xerox" has become for "photocopy."

In the language of advertising, Bin Laden has become a brand - a geopolitical Keyser Soze, an omnipresent menace whose very name invokes perils far beyond his capability. To be sure, his threat is very real. Bin Laden is a financier of considerable means who maintains a network of loyalists committed to a war of terror against the U.S. And he has put his money, connections and notoriety to work in attracting a far wider web of pre-existing Islamist groups to his jihad against Washington.

If Bin Laden didn't exist, we'd have to invent him

Still, the media's picture of Bin Laden sitting in a high-tech Batcave in the mountains around Kandahar ordering up global mayhem at the click of a mouse is more than a little ludicrous. Yes, the various networks of Islamist terror have made full use of the possibilities presented by technology and globalization. But few serious intelligence professionals believe Bin Laden is the puppet-master atop a pyramid structure of terror cells. It's really not that simple, but personalizing the threat - while it distorts both the nature of the problem and the remedy - is a time-honored tradition. Before Bin Laden, the face of the global terror threat against Americans belonged to the Palestinian radical Abu Nidal. Or was it Colonel Ghaddafi? Ayatolla Khomeini, perhaps? And does anyone even remember the chubby jowls of Carlos the Jackal, whose image drawn from an old passport picture was once the icon of global terror?

Personalizing makes it seem more manageable. Bin Laden may be out of reach right now, safe in the care of Afghanistan's Taliban rulers. But by making him the root of the problem, we hold out the possibility that his ultimate removal from the scene will make the world safe from Islamist terror. A comforting thought, but a delusion nonetheless.

The dangers are real. The Cole bombing, and this week's indictments handed down in the Khobar Towers attack, are brutal reminders of the vulnerability of U.S. personnel stationed in the Arab world to attack by extremists. Last Saturday, Indian police arrested a group of men allegedly planning to blow up the U.S. embassy in New Delhi and quickly turned up evidence linking the plot to Bin Laden. Two days later, an unrelated plan, involving suicide bombers killing U.S. agents investigating the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole, was foiled in Yemen; their trail, too, leads back to Bin Laden. He was in the news again the following day after Western reporters were shown a Bin Laden promotional video in which he appeared to claim responsibility for the bombing of the Cole in a macabre poem.

Then there is the sublime: For sheer diabolical genius (of the Hollywood variety), nothing came close to the reports that European security services are preparing to counter a Bin Laden attempt to assassinate President Bush at next month's G8 summit in Genoa, Italy.

According to German intelligence sources, the plot involved Bin Laden paying German neo-Nazis to fly remote controlled-model aircraft packed with Semtex into the conference hall and blow the leaders of the industrialized world to smithereens. (Paging Jerry Bruckheimer...)

The Russians, who believe a Bin Laden attack in Genoa is more likely to be carried out by their old enemy, the Chechens, have sent an advance team of anti terrorism experts (armed, we hope, with small-scale anti-aircraft weapons).

But Bin Laden's role has always been that of facilitator. That was his function in the 'Islamist International' formed, with the active encouragement of the CIA and Egyptian and Saudi intelligence, to recruit volunteers to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. His considerable wealth (and ability to raise funds from others) and his organizational expertise played a key role in helping the "Arab Afghans," as the volunteers became known, play a creditable role in the war against the Soviets. And once that war was won, he continued to play the same role, keeping its veterans together and maintaining an infrastructure to arm, train and fund Islamist warriors for deployment in Muslim armies in places as diverse as Bosnia, Chechnya, Western China and the Philippines.

He's not ducking blame, he's demanding it

Having come under the influence of radical Egyptian Islamists in Afghanistan, Bin Laden found himself in conflict with the pro-Western regime in his native Saudi Arabia. The Gulf War proved to be his breaking point with the Saudi royal family. Driven by a desire to expel the U.S. from the Gulf region and overthrow a royal family he denounced as corrupt apostates, he turned his fire increasingly against America. The World Trade Center bombers may have been motivated by similar concerns - and they may have been inspired by some of the same militant teachings of Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman - but the two don't appear to have been directly linked.

Bin Laden subsequently claimed his men were behind the 1993 debacle in Mogadishu, where 17 U.S. servicemen were killed in a botched raid on a local warlord. Whether or not there's any basis to the claim, Bin Laden wants to be held responsible for that and any other attack for which the media is prepared to blame him. The reason he has spent the past decade offering assistance to a wide range of pre-existing Islamist groups is precisely because he wants to paint himself as the personification of the considerable anti-American sentiment inflaming much of the Arab world, a latter-day Salah el Din driving out the imagined Crusaders. The Western need to personalize the terrorist menace plays into his hands. Indeed, most experts agreed that President Clinton's 1998 cruise missile strikes on Bin Laden were probably the single most important PR boost in the Saudi's career. And the fact that his name is cited by way of explanation for the fact that the world's most powerful military has moved into defensive positions all over the Gulf certainly doesn't do his carefully cultivated image any harm.

Even when groups involved in malfeasance around the world have had dealings with Bin Laden or those close to him, intelligence experts don't believe that the Saudi financier is necessarily pulling the strings when they act. What Bin Laden may in fact personify is the coming together of diverse Islamist groups during the Afghan war, and their identification of the U.S. as their primary enemy during the decade that followed. So lop off the head, and the body continues to function, because it remains a diverse and diffuse set of groups and cells with their own internal structures, driven by a common sense of implacable grievance. That menace will remain, even if Bin Laden is removed. We may simply have to find a new name and face for it.

----
14 posted on 04/12/2004 10:26:25 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Perhaps this is why we were concerned whether Iraq was in some way involved in 9-11

Iraq Says It Will 'Punish' Allies

By Sameer N. Yacoub
Associated Press Writer
Thursday, June 21, 2001; 3:17 p.m. EDT
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010621/aponline151711_000.htm

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- Iraq warned that an alleged U.S.-British airstrike on a soccer field "will not go unpunished," the official Iraqi News Agency reported Thursday.

Iraq claimed that an allied airstrike Tuesday killed 23 people in Tall Afar, 275 miles northwest of Baghdad, but Washington said if there were deaths, they were likely caused by Iraq's own "misdirected ground fire."

"Iraqis will not be terrorized by such criminal acts," Iraq's ambassador to the United Nations, Mohammed al-Douri, told the agency.

U.S. and British defense officials said a mission was flown over Iraq's no-fly zone Tuesday, but denied warplanes fired on any positions.

The Pentagon said Iraqi forces had fired several surface-to-air missiles at allied planes and it appeared that part of at least one of the Iraqi missiles malfunctioned and landed on the soccer field.

"How do the U.S. officials know the missile malfunctioned?" an Iraqi Foreign Ministry official, speaking on condition of anonymity, asked The Associated Press. "Do they have representatives working with our anti-aircraft missiles units?"

Lauren Cannon, the leader of visiting American and British activists currently visiting Iraq, said the group will travel to Tall Afar "to see for ourselves who was behind the deaths."

The newspaper of Iraq's ruling Baath party, Al-Thawra, accused the U.N. Security Council on Thursday of "turning a blind eye to U.S. and British aggression because it is dominated by the United States."

The Security Council imposed sanctions on Iraq after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait.

"This new aggression is more proof of America's political and moral bankruptcy," the paper said in an editorial.

Allied aircraft patrol zones over southern and northern Iraq, which were established after the 1991 Persian Gulf War to protect Shiite Muslims rebels in the south and Kurds in the north. British and American jets enforcing the northern zone are based in Turkey.

Iraq does not recognize the no-fly zones and has challenged allied aircraft since December 1998.

----

15 posted on 04/12/2004 10:30:18 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Ok, the thread is getting long, so I'll just link the headlines that I find interesting:

6/24/01 Afghan Taliban Dismiss Bin Laden Threat Reports
6/25/01 Bin Laden aide denies attack plan As U.S. forces remain on alert, Israel also warns of terror threat
6/26/01 U.S. Has Bin Laden 'On the Run,' Sen. Shelby Says
06/26/01 Overlooking Terrorism
06/26/01 A Memo From Osama
06/29/01 U.S. Tells Taliban to Control Bin Laden

16 posted on 04/12/2004 10:50:41 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
Here's articles from July

07/03/01 Bush Decides to Keep Sanctions on Afghanistan
07/04/01 Terrorist (Millenium Bomber> Details His Training in Afghanistan
07/07/01 White House divided on Saddam
07/10/01

The Declining Terrorist Threat

(NY Times Title of the Year Nominee)
07/11/01 Ashcroft: U.S. Terrorism a Priority -Attorney General John Ashcroft said the Justice Department is working to forge new tools to combat terrorism on domestic soil -- a threat he calls the agency's top priority.
07/18/01 State Dept. Reports Terrorist Threat
07/19/01 New Terror Warning
07/20/01 Afghanistan Sanctions Questioned
07/24/01 U.S. Called Vulnerable To Biological Attack
07/30/01 CIA Role May Grow in Preventing Terror Attacks - ``We know that we're going to increasingly be a target in this country and we also know that intelligence is going to have a role to play in trying to protect the homeland, protect the continental U.S.'' a senior intelligence official familiar with the review told Reuters.
President Bush in May ordered a comprehensive review, giving CIA Director George Tenet a ``broad mandate to challenge the status quo and explore new and innovative techniques, systems, practices and processes for foreign intelligence collection, analysis and distribution.''
17 posted on 04/12/2004 11:36:39 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
How about August

08/06/01 FBI´s growth abroad adds to clashes
08/10/01 US - Iraq Chronology
08/16/01 GAO: FBI Doesn't Always Share Info
08/19/01 F.B.I. Is Investigating a Senior Counterterrorism AgentThe F.B.I. has begun an internal investigation into one of its most senior counterterrorism officials, who misplaced a briefcase containing highly classified information last year. The briefcase contained a number of sensitive documents, including a report outlining virtually every national security operation in New York, government officials said. The agent, John O'Neill, left government service to head up security at World Trade Center and died in the 9-11 attacks
08/21/01 FBI Confirms Probe of Stolen Briefcase
08/21/01 U.S.: FBI Team May Return to Yemen for Cole Probe
08/31/01 2 U.S. Embassies In E. Europe Shut

18 posted on 04/13/2004 12:01:48 AM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
And Finally, early September

09/04/01 US Aircraft Bomb Iraqi Air Defenses
09/04/01 FBI Agents Resume Cole Probe
09/07/01 Committee Approves Intelligence Bill
09/07/01 Americans in Japan warned of possible terror attack
09/09/01 U.S. attacks three Iraqi missile sites
09/11/01 US SHIES AWAY FROM UN TREATIES ON TERRORISM
09/11/01 Planes crash into World Trade Center
09/12/01 Saddam Says 'Evil' U.S. Policy to Blame for Attacks
09/12/01 Plotters Found the Flaw In Nation's Defense Plans - Debate Revived on Sharp Rise of Counterterrorism Spending

19 posted on 04/13/2004 12:28:35 AM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11; Admin Moderator
Washington Post article not excerpted. Good post though. Needs edit.
20 posted on 04/13/2004 3:23:07 AM PDT by tort_feasor ( anti-Semitism is not a lifestyle choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump
21 posted on 04/13/2004 4:37:50 AM PDT by Rocket1968 (Democrats will crash and burn in 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11
bump
22 posted on 04/13/2004 6:57:28 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA
Given the 9-11 commissions report this morning that the Justice Department under Ashcroft did not treat counterterrorism as a top priority, this article from July 2001, is interesting:

07/11/01 Ashcroft: U.S. Terrorism a Priority
In the article, Ashcroft says it is the agency's top priority.

23 posted on 04/13/2004 7:13:35 AM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11

BUMP

Many of these informative articles have links that no longer work, but in the face of the "I tried while Bush did nothing" business thought this deserved a bump and some additional research to update.


24 posted on 09/30/2006 3:11:08 PM PDT by Della Street
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson