Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Chinese bubble is about to pop
WORLD TRIBUNE.COM ^ | Sol Sanders

Posted on 04/17/2004 5:48:29 AM PDT by RusIvan

All signs point to an approaching Chinese economic crisis.

Given the lack of transparency, the impact of the coming “landing” is even less predictable than such economic developments elsewhere.

There are daily announcements by Communist leadership aimed at cooling an overheated economy. But most are fictitious, a cover for bottlenecks in some sectors, unrestrained speculation in others. So any divination is just that.

There is no denying the remarkable last decade’s progress. GDP growth figures are probably exaggerated. The truth is nobody really knows. [One cannot forget an angry ex-Prime Minister Zhu Rongzi publicly dressing down regional officials for giving him manufactured figures.] Given the fact that 80 percent of China’s more than one billion do not share in success of the effort to introduce a liberal economy in a totalitarian state, we have little history to judge the whole experiment.

But here is intelligent Shanghai gossip:

Despite all restrictions, held in place by occasional draconian prosecution [executions], for corruption, illegal “hot money” has poured in. Theoretically Beijing has control of its currency. In fact, in 1997, Zhu, with controls and by juggling export subsidies, spared China the effects of the East Asia Financial Crisis. But that was eons ago in Chinese economic development. Once again, the Chinese have proved their phenomenal entrepreneurial talent. The central bank’s hard currency reserves are now reaching an incredible trillion dollars. That, in turn, introduces inflation with the exchange of imported dollars for renminbao.

Speculators believe, despite all government statements [and the hard line Chinese leaders took with Vice President Cheney this week on American demands for reevaluation], upward movement will come. They want a slice – when they trade back into dollars.

China is suddenly facing an overall trade deficit – nearly $9 billion in the first quarter and likely to grow exponentially. That is despite its enormous U.S. trade surplus. – probably as much as $142 billion last year, and probably growing even more rapidly as U.S. consumer confidence sucks in more consumer goods. The overall trade deficit, likely to snowball so long as China’s export boom continues, results from a growing import bill for raw materials [and components for assemblies China exports]. Ironically, China itself pushes world prices. China has become the world’s second largest oil importer [after the U.S.] with prices rising. [China’s oil imports increased 38 percent last year; predictions were for a fuel imports doubling this year.] China’s pull has inflated world prices – for example, benchmark hot-rolled-sheet price jumped 80 percent to $500 a net ton, a 15-year high.

All this has pressured China’s claptrap financial system. Despite repeated statements by the authorities to brake lending, China’s four main banks probably have increased it by 10 percent just this year. That’s despite signs some sectors are piling up inventories – Shanghai and Beijing real estate, household appliances, automobiles. Again nobody knows, but nonperforming loans may be 50 percent or higher. And, again despite repeated statements, banking practices have not changed. One important reason: China’s huge, Soviet days white elephants, so-called state-owned enterprises [SOEs], are bleeding the banks with their enormous political influence and the fear of additional unemployment were their bankruptcy finally faced. [Recently, Prime Minister Wen Jiatao trotted out the argument their maintenance in the Northeast rustbelt was a matter of national security.] One danger, of course, is of a run on savings institutions by China’s incredibly frugal savers when a switch back to dollars after a postponed reevaluation.

China’s economic fragility is not just a problem for Beijing. As the Chinese maw has grown, it has become a growing market for its neighbors. Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines and Australia have seen their exports to China – including manufactures – grow by as much as 50 percent. Japan is coming out of its decade of stagnation, in part because of the fillip Chinese exports have given its still only partially reformed export-led economy. South Korea, caught in political and economic crosscurrents, counts on its “China boom” for its high tech exports to buoy it until domestic demand returns. Even the U.S., however much it might complain over the loss of jobs to China, continues to have a lower inflation rate in part because Beijing [as well as Tokyo, Seoul, Taipei and Hong Kong] gobble up its treasury notes, halting any “crowding out” of private sector borrowing in capital markets.

Beijing’s new leadership, noted for its non-risk-taking past, is caught in the headlights. It dare not fiddle with the currency tied to the dollar, its only stable economic tool. On the other hand, even if no one else does, Chinese Communists remember their rise to power owed as much if not more to runaway inflation in the last years of the Chiang Kaishek regime as to battlefield victories. [The Chinese “inflationphobia” is as great as the Germans who remember the 20s inflation that brought Hitler.]

An hour of decision is approaching rapidly.

Sol W. Sanders, (solsanders@comcast.net), is an Asian specialist with more than 25 years in the region, and a former correspondent for Business Week, U.S. News & World Report and United Press International. He writes weekly for World Tribune.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: china; globaleconomy; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
China's socialist economy has grown on US trades. America helps communist country to grow. China in turn use huge proits ahe eran in America to prop her military and prepare to future chalanges in Asia. Tell me after this that americans "hate" comminism!

Even with huge and enormous help of United States the socialist economy of China may go under. Another obvious prove that socialism is economically unsound.

1 posted on 04/17/2004 5:48:29 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
Read please how United States help China to grow.
2 posted on 04/17/2004 5:49:29 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Not only that, but...

....there are millions of ticked-off young men running around who can't find a decent job or a wife. There will be more coming soon. This is not a recipe for stability.
3 posted on 04/17/2004 5:54:29 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
This is a problem in a system that does not have check and balance. One can make things up and get away with it.
4 posted on 04/17/2004 6:02:05 AM PDT by Fishing-guy (AL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Nothing creates more instability than a debt-based economy. The ability of a banker to create money out of thin air versus the individual who has to toil for the same money, creates the instability.
5 posted on 04/17/2004 6:06:28 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
GDP growth figures are probably exaggerated.

No! Go on! Get outta here! I can't believe that for a minute!

6 posted on 04/17/2004 6:06:55 AM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Interesting read BTTT
7 posted on 04/17/2004 6:15:26 AM PDT by LowOiL (Christian and proud of it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Hmmm, I know where they can get some very Leftish, if not not good looking, unattached females by the thousands.
8 posted on 04/17/2004 6:30:20 AM PDT by TheOldRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
"Another obvious prove that socialism is economically unsound."

The current Chinese economic system has very little to do with socialism. In many ways it's less socialist than the US system.

9 posted on 04/17/2004 6:34:17 AM PDT by Truthsayer20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
China is no longer Socialist.

China has no system. Until now, the growth in many legitimate sectors covered up the problems. But it is difficult to run banks withour rules, and I do not doubt they will have a bank crisis of a size only China could produce.
10 posted on 04/17/2004 6:36:22 AM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
bump
11 posted on 04/17/2004 6:42:38 AM PDT by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Yes, circa 1980's, reminds me of all the blather about Japan taking over the world...

Japan's phony economic system blew sky high. Not a whimper about Japan conquering the world anymore.

Fast forward to the early 2000's, some fear mongers constantly posting how China will take over the world, blah, blah, blah...

WE WILL GET THE LAST LAUGH ONCE AGAIN.
12 posted on 04/17/2004 6:43:51 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldRepublic
Yeah, let's 'shanghai' them and send 'em over!
13 posted on 04/17/2004 6:57:08 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: eno_; RusIvan
"......China is no longer Socialist......."

Fascism: A totalitarian government led by a dictator and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism, militarism and often racism.

While NOT in the (above) strict definition of Fascism, I usually include a direct collusion (and a blurring of the lines) between the government and the private sector ala the Nazis like munitions manufacturers and capitialists that profited by cheap non-union labor. Herr Schindler's use of death-camp laborers, among others, comes to mind as an example with regards to the latter point.

14 posted on 04/17/2004 6:58:22 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eno_
It's more like Peronism, which a finance minister in the 80's defined as "socialism without planning and capitalism without free markets". Guaranteed markets and profits for business and guaranteed raises for workers with the government printing money like crazy to pay for it all.
15 posted on 04/17/2004 7:08:48 AM PDT by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Capitalism and communisn can't coexist for long.

The imminent collapse of the Chinese economy will set loose the forces of total freedom.

16 posted on 04/17/2004 7:11:55 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
A decent war would probably solve all their problems. Either a major civil war (possible but unlikely) or a major war of expansion (which would also solve their lack of females problem). Either one could have some possible economic repercussions on the U.S. economy.
17 posted on 04/17/2004 7:13:00 AM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
The real secret told to me by a US furniture makere is that we are busy setting up factories in Vietnam - they work for about a third of what the Chinese do and they are supposedly better workers because they have more "European blood" in them through breeding with French and US soldiers.
Sounds racist but that's how these businessmen think unfortunately - screw the American worker and then screw the Chinese worker.
18 posted on 04/17/2004 7:14:26 AM PDT by afz400
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
ping
19 posted on 04/17/2004 7:16:53 AM PDT by cp124 (The Great Wall Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
China is not a socialist economy anymore. Capitalism has taken hold. The problems described, other than the SOE, are classic capitalist boom-or-bust business cycle problems. While there is a robust pulic sector it is propbably no bigger than our own.

I bet it is 10 time easier to open a new chip fab, furniture factory or noodle stand in Shanghai than it is in San Jose.

Which Socialist economy is failing?
20 posted on 04/17/2004 7:20:28 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson