To: optimistically_conservative
But until the Digest investigation, published in July 1998, just weeks before the twin Africa embassy bombings, bin Laden had been presented as a relic of the U.S-backed mujahedin in Afghanistan, an exotic but safely distant product of "blowback" left over from the CIA's alliance with Pakistan's much-feared Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).An interesting article, but not entirely true.
Dispelling the CIA-Bin Laden Myth
5 posted on
04/17/2004 4:30:36 PM PDT by
Monitor
(Gun control isn't about guns; it's about control.)
To: Monitor
Thanks for correcting the record, but it is true in 1998 that many in government considered bin Laden a terrorist financier that had benefitted from the mujahedin fight against the USSR.
Bin Laden - oddly - did benefit quite a bit from being part of the Arab Afghan fight. He did it within an organization that had Arab backing rather than US backing.
7 posted on
04/17/2004 5:33:48 PM PDT by
optimistically_conservative
(If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous. T.B.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson