Skip to comments.
Lab Tests Could Link Saddam's Missing WMDs to Jordan Plot
NewsMax.com ^
| 4/21/04
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 04/20/2004 11:45:19 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: kattracks
21
posted on
04/21/2004 5:24:19 AM PDT
by
genefromjersey
(So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
To: kattracks
Ah the Loftus Report. He is a Dem, but he still thinks there the WMD are hidden in the desert or Syria.
22
posted on
04/21/2004 5:28:58 AM PDT
by
mware
To: kattracks
Notice how this is not being reported in the national media...?
To: ovrtaxt
I definitely plan to buy that book. It looks like good reading and I respect those 2 gentlemen who wrote it.
To: MeekOneGOP; kayak; davidtalker; PhilDragoo; Liz; onyx; nicmarlo; Happy2BMe; potlatch; devolve; ...
"Oh, yeah ! I heard David Gold talking about this yesterday on local radio 990 AM. I forget the Colonel's name (McInnerny - sp?) he had on his show JUST before the guy was going to appear on Brit Hume's Special Report. Brit Hume and Fox News are to be highly commended as being the ONLY major network broadcasting the TRUTH about WWIII.
The two US (retired) military officers interviewed were both retired generals (one USAF, one USArmy).
The one you mention (Lt. General McInerney - 3 Star) was the former commander of NORAD - North American Aerospace Defense Command and the former Alaskan Air Command.
General McInerney knows what he is talking about. He had direct authority to launch nucelar and tactical preemptive and counterstrikes on the former Soviet Union in case of war.
In other words, this guy knows and understands the threat of the Islamic Holy War on the Untied States and is telling people (WARNING people) of the direness and urgency of the threat.
In fact, both generals warned, "The war emerging in Iraq and the Islamic threat to the United States is every bit as serious as World War II."
These are no idle words folks - this warning is coming from men who carried a huge portion of the defense responsibility during the years of the Cold War with the Soviet Union (you know - the ones who promised to wipe us from the face of the earth with nuclear weapons).
Make no mistake about it - this is a Holy War. And at least 50% of Americans are blowing it off as a "political ploy" by George Bush to regain the White House.
25
posted on
04/21/2004 5:53:29 AM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
To: kattracks; hchutch
Ping. The Shi'ite is about to hit the fan.
26
posted on
04/21/2004 5:58:02 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Darkdrake Lives!)
To: Happy2BMe
Well..not 50% at the moment..All these books,the 911 commission,Kennedy and Kerry slams do not seem to be taking the expected toll.
Now I don't know what will happen in Iraq and with the rest of our allies,but we'd better gear up to be ready to fight aginst this fifth column in this country that aids and abets the enemy by carping constantly and thus encourages further attacks on our men and the Iraqi people.
27
posted on
04/21/2004 6:03:07 AM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: kattracks
Oops!
28
posted on
04/21/2004 6:31:43 AM PDT
by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
To: Poohbah; section9; Dog; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; Howlin; PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; Catspaw; ...
Look what we have here...
Is there anything Bashir Assad MIGHT want to tell us BEFORE we finish the lab tests?
Or shall we pull out Sir Arthur Harris's playbook - and make Damascus the MidEast's Dresden?
29
posted on
04/21/2004 6:33:22 AM PDT
by
hchutch
(Tommy Thompson's ephedra ban STINKS.)
To: eclectic
the administration has been gun-shy about these things since the press went out of their way to invent a scandal for the bogus "sixteen words." They will require absolute proof before making the evidence known to cut through the fog of media bias or else they will get shot down by an annonymous source at the CIA who does not like the fact that their boneheaded theory about al-queda and Iraq not working together is being proven wrong.
Either that or they are waiting for Kerry to go further down the anti-war path. October surprise anyone? I suspect that this is only the first Ace in Bush's hand and poor Kerry has already shown most of his cards. Don't play Poker with a Texan, particularly if you are a liberal Mass. weeinie boy. I suspect the dems willl again be outsmarted after "misunderestimating" a very smart man.
30
posted on
04/21/2004 6:55:19 AM PDT
by
Dr Snide
(Rocking like Janet Reno)
To: eclectic
the administration has been gun-shy about these things since the press went out of their way to invent a scandal for the bogus "sixteen words." They will require absolute proof before making the evidence known to cut through the fog of media bias or else they will get shot down by an annonymous source at the CIA who does not like the fact that their boneheaded theory about al-queda and Iraq not working together is being proven wrong.
Either that or they are waiting for Kerry to go further down the anti-war path. October surprise anyone? I suspect that this is only the first Ace in Bush's hand and poor Kerry has already shown most of his cards. Don't play Poker with a Texan, particularly if you are a liberal Mass. weeinie boy. I suspect the dems willl again be outsmarted after "misunderestimating" a very smart man.
31
posted on
04/21/2004 6:55:21 AM PDT
by
Dr Snide
(Rocking like Janet Reno)
To: hchutch
To borrow from the Passover it looks like "This Year in Damascus".
To: Happy2BMe
thanks for the ping I like your comments
33
posted on
04/21/2004 6:59:53 AM PDT
by
TrueBeliever9
(aut viam inveniam aut faciam (where there is a will - there is a way)
To: rintense
AP has had the story, it was posted on MSNBC's website as early as Sunday, its just the editors are choosing not to go with it. Obviously Woodward's book is sooooo much more important than an al-queda attack on a U.S. embassy using Iraqi WMD hidden in Syria. There simply is not time after the all important Bush bash segments to fit it in. Besides its not on the Democratic party talking points memo they got. Maybe the problem is a lack of intellectual curiosity?
34
posted on
04/21/2004 7:02:27 AM PDT
by
Dr Snide
(Rocking like Janet Reno)
To: ovrtaxt; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; devolve; onyx; yall
Thanks for that text, there.General TOM MCINERNEY, not Colonel. I was thinking General but for some reason, I decided it was Colonel. Hope he's not lurking here today .... he might not appreciate me demoting him like that, lol! ;^)
Both McInerney and Valleley get it. I'm surprised that Colmes almost seems to get it, too (the 'whether we agree or disagree' means he disagrees, though). These two are right on target, imho. McInerney said that those EIGHT nations are the keys to winning this thing. Really just Syria, Iran and N. Korea left. Let's do it ! McInerney said we need to get started SOON too, before the election this year.
If ya'll didn't see it already, see ovrtaxt's post there. Here is part of it. I'll post my fat teddy pics to 'All' in a minute ...
HANNITY: .... But then you have people like Ted Kennedy (search) doing the bidding for John Kerry (search) in a political season, using the term Vietnam, terms like quagmire, politicizing the war, does it render a president impotent, to get the job done? MCINERNEY: No, but it is absolutely aiding and abetting. It is disgraceful to use those kind of words.
My first tour in Vietnam of four, President Kennedy was there. The next two was President Johnson. We should not politicize this.
HANNITY: But we have, haven't we?
MCINERNEY: We have, and that is disgraceful.
VALLELY: It absolutely is. When you talk to those soldiers over there and they hear this from the likes of a Kennedy, who never served, by the way, doesn't understand what war is but talks a lot about it, that they politicize this to the point that we have to make -- make the world and the entire world understand, that is a world war, and we have to win it.
HANNITY: This is point I've been trying to make. Evil is existing in the world and in a way that we never imagined, when you factor in the technology, technological advances and weapons of mass destruction.
35
posted on
04/21/2004 7:23:44 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
To: yall
36
posted on
04/21/2004 7:25:26 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
To: olde north church
37
posted on
04/21/2004 7:44:07 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
To: MeekOneGOP
Anybody here, seen my old friend Teddy?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
Yeah, he's at the bar.
38
posted on
04/21/2004 7:51:21 AM PDT
by
olde north church
(The opposite of authoritarianism isn't Libertarianism, it's anarachy.)
To: Happy2BMe
39
posted on
04/21/2004 7:55:20 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
To: olde north church
Oh, yeah. I bet he's already started today ....
40
posted on
04/21/2004 7:56:28 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson