Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K
Again, No. the NRST is a replacement for the income tax, and that is why they're in the same terms. If you want to use ta-x exclusive terms (like sales taxes are quoted), let's start telling every american that pays a 25% tax rate thet they're really paying 33.33%. It's the same amount of money.
95 posted on 04/23/2004 9:22:01 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Remember_Salamis
We are replacing the current system BECAUSE it is so difficult to understand. I did not know, for example, that current tax rates are expressed in the 'tax inclusive' terms- and I doubt very many people here know what is their tax rate (in either terminology).

So... if the intent is to simplify the tax code, why use the more complex tax rate calculation?
97 posted on 04/24/2004 8:20:41 AM PDT by Mr. K (ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,I stole this cuz its funny,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
Again, No. the NRST is a replacement for the income tax, and that is why they're in the same terms.

OK, since the NRST proponents think we have use the same terms to compare the sales tax to the income/payroll tax, my effective tax rate (income and payroll) on my income last year was 19.77%. The NRST is 23%. Does that mean I'll be paying more with the NRST?
98 posted on 04/24/2004 8:27:18 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson