[Shermy]

One more thing...

Consider that the Czechs named the April date just after 9/11.

Afterwards, we find that this date "just happens" to be available in the Atta timeline. That it "just happens" involve a date in the Fine report, or part of which, was not publicized (See Respekt articles). That it "just happens" to involve a date that all publicized American timelines are silent about, or say there is no information about. That the antis never, never offer an alternative location for Atta at that time.

Put another way, other than the Czech reports themselves, is there anything in the mountains of information released about Atta that disproves the Czechs?

Nope. Except for a lie about Vaclav Havel. Isn't it about time the antis prove themselves? And if they can't, don't they deserve at least the same amount of denigration that has been heaped on the Czechs?

[Travis McGee]

All valid points, and unanswerable.