IF this is true...then I would propose that this judgement is the result of another runaway jury/judicial system. If the woman was morbidly obese (a prime candidate for cardio/vascular disease and early eath to begin with) and had been off the drug for 4 years before any symptom or sign of trouble began, how could this be pinned on Wyeth?
Then again, I still haven't seen the huge problem with the "fen-phen". Maybe it's just me, but it doesn't appear that the risks of this drug is any higher than a lot of drugs out there. If there is some sort of info I am not familiar with that would change this view - please feel free....
What makes you think that the jury cared about that? She's dead, they have a lot of money, and that's about all your fellow citizens need when it comes to assigning liability for things.