To: The kings dead
First of all, I supported Toomey.
Second of all, I support Specter vs. any Dem short of Zell Miller.
Third of all, moving to the center in a general election where Dems outnumber Repubs by 1/3 million is hardly unusual or unexpected.
What it does suggest is what many people here guessed: that in the general Toomey would have had a harder time.
10 posted on
04/29/2004 6:37:45 AM PDT by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
To: LS
What it does suggest is what many people here guessed: that in the general Toomey would have had a harder time. If that were the case, then Santorum would not be Senator.
16 posted on
04/29/2004 6:40:33 AM PDT by
Coop
(Freedom isn't free)
To: LS
I supported Toomey. The "keen FR political strategists" I referred to opposed Toomey.
25 posted on
04/29/2004 6:44:10 AM PDT by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: LS
a vote for Specter is a vote for liberalism and a vote for his DEM challenger is a vote for conservativism. BANK on it.
27 posted on
04/29/2004 6:44:37 AM PDT by
gdc61
To: LS
moving to the center Specter has moved past it.
32 posted on
04/29/2004 6:46:12 AM PDT by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: LS
Why have a mob connected person like Specter in office?
200 posted on
04/29/2004 8:36:20 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
To: LS
Why have a mob connected person like Specter in office?
201 posted on
04/29/2004 8:36:23 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson