To: gdc61
"just wondering ;o)"
I'm sure you are, and it's kind of sad that you have to jab at my handle.
Anyway, if you must have background, I was hoping Toomey would win. I don't live in Pennsylvania, and I wasn't about to commit voter fraud to ensure a win. But Toomey lost, and now the Pennsylvania Senate race is between two people who are going to oppose Bush's nominees no matter what. In looking for a reason to vote for one over the other, only one emerges: Senate majority.
But what do I know about anything, eh?
371 posted on
05/01/2004 7:40:50 PM PDT by
Terpfen
(Re-elect Bush; kill terrorists now, fix Medicare later.)
To: Terpfen
not really a jab. more, helping someone get to a level they could not attain themselves. for myself, God helps me up on the post. that was a long day and i think i started seeing things. LOL ...as for Toomey ... i have studied and thought it through, and have reached the conclusion it would be better to lose one seat in the senate and remove a fake republican from a position of authority, than to worry about a majority that is hobled and backstabbed and unable to achieve any conservative goals. we have a very good chance of retaining the senate without specter and with him gone Sen. Kyl would be the new chair of the juditiary committee. specter out is one less stumbling block to W. gdc61 obviuosly my initials and birth year, whats a terpfen? ;0)
372 posted on
05/02/2004 6:22:25 AM PDT by
gdc61
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson