Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gdc61
a vote for Specter is a vote for liberalism and a vote for his DEM challenger is a vote for conservativism. BANK on it.

Absolutely correct. The only way to advance the conservative agenda is with a conservative chair of the Judiciary. If the Republicans retain control of the Senate (likely even without Specter), Kyl gets the chairmanship. A conservative chairman beats one back bench rookie senator any day. I'm still leaning towards writing in Toomey just so there's no misunderstanding my message.
56 posted on 04/29/2004 6:59:11 AM PDT by PA BOOKEND
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: PA BOOKEND
If the senate is a lock, I might write Toomey in too. The more I read of this the madder I get at the Specter voters, especially the conservative ones.
69 posted on 04/29/2004 7:09:48 AM PDT by stevio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson