To: gdc61
a vote for Specter is a vote for liberalism and a vote for his DEM challenger is a vote for conservativism. BANK on it.
Absolutely correct. The only way to advance the conservative agenda is with a conservative chair of the Judiciary. If the Republicans retain control of the Senate (likely even without Specter), Kyl gets the chairmanship. A conservative chairman beats one back bench rookie senator any day. I'm still leaning towards writing in Toomey just so there's no misunderstanding my message.
To: PA BOOKEND
If the senate is a lock, I might write Toomey in too. The more I read of this the madder I get at the Specter voters, especially the conservative ones.
69 posted on
04/29/2004 7:09:48 AM PDT by
stevio
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson