To: AntiGuv
IMO after all is said and done, the punch card ballots are less expensive, less complicated and more accurate than any touch screen voting machine.
2 posted on
05/01/2004 6:11:23 AM PDT by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
To: kellynla
I like optical scan voting myself, but I don't disagree with you either.
3 posted on
05/01/2004 6:15:51 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
To: kellynla
the punch card ballots are less expensive, less complicated and more accurate than any touch screen voting machine.Yep, we use punchcards here, (Virginia Beach,VA), I've yet to see a chad of any sort. It's simple, quick and easy.
6 posted on
05/01/2004 6:35:32 AM PDT by
csvset
To: kellynla
Why in heck don't we just use the ATM's?
Simple, quick, easy, leaves two paper records - one in the machine, one to the customer.
The things are everywhere, too - no need for absentee ballots.
And the banks execute billions of transactions a day, with very, very, few errors.
And they would be happy to do it - for a buck a vote. Much cheeper than our current efforts.
7 posted on
05/01/2004 6:45:08 AM PDT by
patton
(I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson