Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Contradicting Bill President Bush says Clinton placed little emphasis on terrorism
TIME Magazine ^ | Sunday, May. 02, 2004 | Timothy J Burger

Posted on 05/02/2004 6:45:13 AM PDT by Condor51

How much of a warning did Bill Clinton give incoming President George W. Bush that Osama bin Laden posed a grave danger? It depends on which President you ask. In his interview with the 9/11 commission last week, sources tell Time, Bush testified that Clinton appeared far more passionate about the dangers of North Korea's nuclear program and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. According to sources, Bush said Clinton "probably mentioned" terrorism as a national-security threat "but did not make it a point of emphasis." Clinton earlier told the panel that he had ranked bin Laden as the No. 1 problem the new Administration would face; he made the same point in a speech in New York City last October.

The content of the testimony Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney gave in the Oval Office remains confidential. But a source says Bush told the commission he had not been warned of the CIA's and the FBI's concerns about would-be 747 pilot Zacarias Moussaoui, who was arrested in August 2001.

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; bush; bushtestimony; clarke; clinton; clintonfailures; clintonlegacy; iraq; moussaoui; northkorea; nukes; waronterror; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
I searched and couldn't find this article. The link just came up on Drudge

Also, I excerpted because I'm not sure if TIME Mag is on 'the list'.

1 posted on 05/02/2004 6:45:14 AM PDT by Condor51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Condor51
This is exactly what Bush needs to be doing. Making sure that he counters every lie thrown his way.

Of course...when talking about Clinton..that could take a while.
2 posted on 05/02/2004 6:46:48 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (There is no problem so great that it cannot be solved with high powered explosives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51; Howlin; Miss Marple; Mo1
Well, lets see..............one man is a pathological liar, and the other is possible the most honest President we've had since Abe Lincoln....

Who shall I believe??? Decisions, decisions................

3 posted on 05/02/2004 6:47:45 AM PDT by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
I just read the article from the Drudge link. It's laughable, really. When given the choice as to who is lying, will the American people choose Clinton, the Impeached Prevaricator, or Bush?
4 posted on 05/02/2004 6:48:37 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (Charter member Broken Glass Republicans (2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Exactly. Bush must get out there continually to define Clinton's charges as being the red herrings they are. (to deflect attention from Clinton's abysmal record).
5 posted on 05/02/2004 6:48:49 AM PDT by tkathy (nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
THIS IS PROBABLY WHY BOB KERREY AND LEE HAMILTON LEFT IN MIDDLE OF BUSH/CHENEY TESTIMONY.

THEY COULD NOT STAND HEARING THE TRUTH.
6 posted on 05/02/2004 6:49:29 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Considering X42 has a huge credibility question after his actions and Congress's and subsequent Judicial actions taken against him who would you rather believe?
7 posted on 05/02/2004 6:52:52 AM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
This is exactly what Bush needs to be doing.

Its probably why Hamilton and Kerrey walked out early during the Commission Q&A of Bush/Cheyney. They didn't want to hear about their hero's lies about his No. 1 concern being Bin Laden.

8 posted on 05/02/2004 6:53:17 AM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
THIS IS PROBABLY WHY BOB KERREY AND LEE HAMILTON LEFT IN MIDDLE OF BUSH/CHENEY TESTIMONY.

Great minds thin alike. Unless, of course your name is Joe Biden

9 posted on 05/02/2004 6:54:30 AM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
"Also, I excerpted because I'm not sure if TIME Mag is on 'the list'."

Not according to this

10 posted on 05/02/2004 7:00:15 AM PDT by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
Clinton didn't place much emphasis on terrorism. Understatement of the year.
11 posted on 05/02/2004 7:01:19 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Well, lets see..............one man is a pathological liar, and the other is possible the most honest President we've had since Abe Lincoln....

Bush is a Liar!!!!!!! He lied about.....well, there was, uhhhhh......wait, I remember there was that time when....uhhh.....you know, when he ummmmm....uhhhhhh.....BUSH IS A LIAR AND YOU'RE A RACIST!!!

</sarcasm>

12 posted on 05/02/2004 7:04:00 AM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
Slick handed Bush a 45,000 page intelligence document on the state of US national intelligence......Al Quaida was not mentioned once!!!
13 posted on 05/02/2004 7:04:04 AM PDT by Coroner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
All anyone has to do is read Toon's last few Security Strategy Statements to see how Toon regarded the threat of terrorism. Those docs speak for themselves.
14 posted on 05/02/2004 7:10:46 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
As many predicted, it didn't take long for the leaks to start a-commin'. Ben Veniste, Gorelick, Kerrey, Hamilton - the possibilies are unlimited.
15 posted on 05/02/2004 7:12:47 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Florida 2000: There Would Have Been No 5-4 Without A 7-2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
This is exactly what Bush needs to be doing. Making sure that he counters every lie thrown his way.

Yes. But the Administration should NOT be disparaging Ashcroft for releasing the Gorelick memos. Rather GWB should be vocal about her and her involvement.

[It seems GWB keeps covering for the Clinton administration, even while the Dems are skewering GWB. GWB needs to realize they are NOT his friends. One radio pundit this past week said that the Dems are setting GWB up. Their intent is to seek impeachment in the next term, if GWB wins the Nov election.]
16 posted on 05/02/2004 7:14:03 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach
My own interpretation of President Bush's saying to the early-departing Kerrey, "Keep your spirits up": Bush's facts had just demolished Kerrey's accusations about the administration. Bush's remark could very well have been, "Cheer up, Kerrey!"
17 posted on 05/02/2004 7:14:42 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Thanks for the latest link, I book marked it.
18 posted on 05/02/2004 7:14:43 AM PDT by Condor51 ("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: I'm ALL Right!
ping
19 posted on 05/02/2004 7:15:04 AM PDT by No Fool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Way too early in the day to decide something of this importance.

I'll have to get back to you.

:-0
20 posted on 05/02/2004 7:20:04 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson