Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burr files to run, changes his mind about NAFTA
journalnow.com ^ | 05/02/04 | David Rice

Posted on 05/02/2004 3:23:42 PM PDT by KQQL

Trade agreement may have been good for U.S. but hasn't helped N.C., he says

U.S. Rep. Richard Burr filed yesterday to run for a new office, the U.S. Senate, saying that he has changed his mind about NAFTA, a trade agreement he once supported and has criticized Democrat Erskine Bowles for supporting.

"I actually wasn't in Congress when we passed NAFTA, but I said in 1994 had I been there I would have voted for it," said Burr, R-5th, who filed to run for the Senate seat being vacated by Democratic Sen. John Edwards. Like Bowles, who lobbied for the North American Free Trade Agreement as a member of the Clinton administration, "I'm big enough to say that the picture I had of NAFTA in 1994 ... didn't turn out the way I pictured it," Burr said, referring to his position as a "reversal."

"NAFTA may have been good overall for the United States.... But if you gauge it based upon employment in North Carolina, it has not been a net advantage," he said.

Still, Burr has hammered Bowles for lobbying for NAFTA and for most-favored-nation trading status for China.

"Now, with NAFTA at the forefront of costing many North Carolinians their jobs, Mr. Bowles has changed his position to one of opposing this agreement," Burr said in one recent fund-raising letter.

"But even more troubling is his handling of communist China.... I voted eight separate times to oppose most-favored-nation status (for China) and I remain opposed to it today, and will continue to do so until it is fair and equitable for America and our workers. Unfortunately, I don't think we can say the same about Mr. Bowles," Burr wrote.

In response to Burr's remarks, Bowles' campaign said that Burr is being hypocritical.

"How can Richard Burr with a straight face attack Erskine on trade, when Burr supported NAFTA and voted for trade deal after trade deal after trade deal?" asked Carlos Monje, a spokesman for the Bowles campaign.

Burr continued to criticize Bowles yesterday for his past support of trade with China. He said that as recently as 2000, Bowles lobbied Rep. Eva Clayton, D-1st, to support most-favored-nation status for China.

"With eight votes against a China agreement, I think it's hard for that not to be an issue in this campaign," Burr said.

"I'm going to run on my record, and I would expect his record to be fair game," he said. "I think North Carolinians expect consistency from their elected representatives."

Bowles' campaign said that Bowles called Clayton to get Chinese restrictions on imports of U.S. tobacco lifted.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: electionussenate; nafta; richardburr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: ncweaver
I too would prefer Walter Jones as the candidate. He has shown to be a real fighter just like Jesse Helms. Jones spoke out against the pro-homosexual children's book in the Wilmington school district and the forced political correctness training that UNC-Chapel Hill makes its students go through. Jones is conservative hero.
21 posted on 05/02/2004 9:11:50 PM PDT by Kuksool (9-11 happened when the RATS controlled the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
...which means Bowles will win. Ugh.
22 posted on 05/02/2004 9:25:24 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Yo Theodore, that was a totally idiotic comment. Think about the race for a minute and reevaluate.

Darn right. Hey Theodore, why don't you pass the time by playing a little solitaire?
23 posted on 05/02/2004 9:38:21 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Come on dude that's what millions of dollars in advertizing will buy, name recogntion.
24 posted on 05/02/2004 9:42:53 PM PDT by Impy (The DCCC and DSCC are terrorist organizations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Why are they talking about NAFTA anyway? It's not in danger of being repealed.
25 posted on 05/02/2004 9:46:33 PM PDT by Impy (The DCCC and DSCC are terrorist organizations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy
NAFAT hasn't been enforced as written in law.
26 posted on 05/02/2004 10:22:23 PM PDT by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I wonder if there is a better-known candidate with name ID who could get nominated if Burr continues to trail so badly in the polls. It looks like Burr cannot win.




Name ID's build, they don't grown on trees.



Democratic candidate Erskine Bowles is recognized by 86.8 percent of registered voters in the race for the U.S. Senate, and Republican Rep. Richard Burr is recognized by 45.5 percent, according to a poll released yesterday.

The Elon University Poll
http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031775203429&path=!localnews!elections&s=1037645509113
27 posted on 05/02/2004 10:23:55 PM PDT by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I wonder if there is a better-known candidate with name ID who could get nominated if Burr continues to trail so badly in the polls. It looks like Burr cannot win.




Theodore R.: Name ID's are build, they don't grown on trees.



Democratic candidate Erskine Bowles is recognized by 86.8 percent of registered voters in the race for the U.S. Senate, and Republican Rep. Richard Burr is recognized by 45.5 percent, according to a poll released yesterday.

The Elon University Poll
http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031775203429&path=!localnews!elections&s=1037645509113
28 posted on 05/02/2004 10:24:25 PM PDT by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson