Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/03/2004 2:27:56 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
But I thought Weasely Clark would NEVER accept the VP nomination. Top spot or nothing, we were told.

But what a wonderful trial balloon to test the potential for Herself.
2 posted on 05/03/2004 2:37:07 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Gephardt?? Seriously??
By all means go for it but looking at it that seems to be a mistake.
Edwards? Now, he was able to stir some stumps. If as the Dems believe that national security is down the list, them an Edwards selection makes sense.
Clark, maybe...I didn't see him getting a whole lot of traction with the voters.
3 posted on 05/03/2004 2:57:15 AM PDT by Adder (Cna we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
How is that a war the left hated then is so important as a qualification for office now?
4 posted on 05/03/2004 3:30:35 AM PDT by Dahoser (9/11---The Legacy of Clinton treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

7 posted on 05/03/2004 5:34:41 AM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Sen. John Kerry's campaign believes Clark would be a big plus in its bid to convince voters that a Democratic White House would be just as tough on security issues as Republicans.

Good God. The only worse choice would be Howard Dean.

Really, truly, does it really matter who John Kerry picks? The top of the ticket would be so gosh-darn awful, I doubt anyone will care who the VEEP martyr, er, candidate would be...

9 posted on 05/03/2004 6:28:59 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"Clark said he's "not interested in that position," after vigorously defending the military service of Kerry, whose anti-war activism 30 years ago was attacked by Republicans last week."

That's right. Clark wants to be SecDef.

Wait till he stats getting the questions about how he singlehandedly almost started a war with Russia.
12 posted on 05/03/2004 7:17:51 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Only difference between the liberals and the Nazis is that the liberals love the Communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
A pair of flip flops.
13 posted on 05/03/2004 7:34:45 AM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Kerry/Clark--the Serbophobic Orthodox Christian-bashing Third Way-imperialist islamoNazi-terrorist gay abortionist ticket!!!!
14 posted on 05/03/2004 7:35:25 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Christ is risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
dems have lost what's left of their minds. they're
abandoning what principled positions they had left and
running after men with military records -- ANY military
record, mind you -- like drunken sophomores chasing after
the prom queen.
16 posted on 05/03/2004 7:23:23 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson