Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dutch drug policies do not increase marijuana use, first rigorous comparative study finds
UC Santa Cruz Currents Online ^ | May 3, 2004 | Jennifer McNulty

Posted on 05/03/2004 9:43:24 AM PDT by cryptical

In the first rigorous study comparing marijuana use in the Netherlands and the United States, researchers have found no evidence that decriminalization of marijuana leads to increased drug use. The results suggest that drug policies may have less impact on marijuana use than is currently thought.

The findings appear in the May issue of the American Journal of Public Health. Craig Reinarman, professor of sociology at UCSC, coauthored the article, “The Limited Relevance of Drug Policy: Cannabis in Amsterdam and in San Francisco,” with Peter D. A. Cohen, director of the Centre for Drug Research (CEDRO) at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, and Hendrien L. Kaal, now an instructor at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands.

The study compared the cannabis (marijuana and hashish) habits of users in Amsterdam and San Francisco to test the premise that punishment for cannabis use deters use and thereby benefits public health.

“We compared representative samples of experienced marijuana users to see whether the lawful availability of marijuana did, in fact, lead to the problems critics of the Dutch system have claimed,” said Reinarman. “We found no evidence that it does. In fact, we found consistently strong similarities in patterns of marijuana use, despite vastly different national drug policies.”

Highlights of the study include:

• The mean age at onset of use was 16.95 years in Amsterdam and 16.43 years in San Francisco.

• The mean age at which respondents began using marijuana more than once per month was 19.11 years in Amsterdam and 18.81 years in San Francisco.

• In both cities, users began their periods of maximum use about two years after they began regular use: 21.46 years in Amsterdam and 21.98 years in San Francisco.

• About 75 percent in both cities had used cannabis less than once per week or not at all in the year before the interview.

• Majorities of experienced users in both cities never used marijuana daily or in large amounts even during their periods of peak use, and use declined after those peak periods.

The Netherlands effectively decriminalized marijuana use in 1976, and it is available for purchase in small quantities by adults in licensed coffee shops; in the United States, marijuana use carries stiff criminal penalties, and more than 720,000 people were arrested for marijuana offenses in 2001.

The study was funded by the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Dutch Ministry of Health.

In identical questionnaires administered in Amsterdam and San Francisco (cities chosen for their similarities as politically liberal northern port cities with universities and populations of roughly 700,000 people), nearly 500 respondents who had used marijuana at least 25 times were asked detailed questions about their marijuana use. The questionnaire explored such issues as age at first use, regular and maximum use, frequency and quantity of use over time, intensity and duration of intoxication, career use patterns, and use of other illicit drugs.

“In the United States, marijuana policy is based on the assertion that strict penalties are the best way to inhibit use,” said Reinarman.

The study’s findings cast doubt on that scenario, he said. Despite widespread lawful availability of cannabis in Amsterdam, there were no differences between the two cities in age at onset of use, age at first regular use, or age at the start of maximum use.

The study found no evidence that lawfully regulated cannabis provides a “gateway” to other illicit drug use. In fact, marijuana users in San Francisco were far more likely to have used other illicit drugs--cocaine, crack, amphetamines, ecstasy, and opiates--than users in Amsterdam, said Reinarman.

“The results of this study shift the burden of proof now to those who would arrest hundreds of thousands of Americans each year on the grounds that it deters use,” said Reinarman.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: addiction; drugwar; marijuana; netherlands; prohibition; wod; wodlist
Another myth crumbling.
1 posted on 05/03/2004 9:43:25 AM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Wod_list; jmc813; The kings dead; Wolfie
'Must be a case of the Mondays' ping.
2 posted on 05/03/2004 9:44:43 AM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
the United States, marijuana use carries stiff criminal penalties, and more than 720,000 people were arrested for marijuana offenses in 2001

That's alot of fines, and siezed property to fatten the lawyers, PD's and courts.

3 posted on 05/03/2004 9:47:56 AM PDT by Darryl Newhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darryl Newhart
Make that SEIZED
4 posted on 05/03/2004 9:48:33 AM PDT by Darryl Newhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
?The results of this study shift the burden of proof now to those who would arrest hundreds of thousands of Americans each year on the grounds that it deters use,? said Reinarman. "

Well, it ought to but I'm not holding my breath...
5 posted on 05/03/2004 9:52:27 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
This one has been here a while this morning.
6 posted on 05/03/2004 9:59:39 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
"Duh! I coulda told you that" Alert.

Don't even think about decriminalization though. Remember Nixon's presidential commission on drugs that he ignored because the results weren't anti-drug like he wanted?

What's surprising in this case is that the NIDA actually allowed this report to be released. It probably took some arm-twisting by the Dutch.
7 posted on 05/03/2004 10:07:28 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdadams; Admin Moderator
So it is, Moderator can remove it.
8 posted on 05/03/2004 10:15:03 AM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
This isn't a scientific study--any statistician would toss this one in the trash.

A comparison of Amsterdam Before vs. After might be worth something, but for all we know, Amsterdam use doubled with legalization, and SF use could do the same if it were legalized.

A comparison of SF today vs. Amsterdam today cannot say anything about the effects of legalization. It might just mean that Americans like Marijuana more than the Dutch.

9 posted on 05/03/2004 11:33:27 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
It might just mean that Americans like Marijuana more than the Dutch.

It might also just mean that Americans like hard drugs more than the Dutch.

10 posted on 05/03/2004 12:05:08 PM PDT by jedi (Pre-digested opinions are so much easier to assimilate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Not all effects, apparently just the frequency of use by users in the two cities.

I haven't seen the full study, but I don't think it claims to study the incidence of use across the entire population.

I wonder if there is a 'before' study for Amsterdam that gives a count of users, that could be tied to an 'after' that shows the increase (or decrease) in use after the law changed.

11 posted on 05/03/2004 12:45:49 PM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
Again, the study does not isolate other factors, but rather just compares a city where it's legal to a city where it's illegal, yet the author here tries to make a connection with stating that legalization doesn't affect drug use. That's just BS.
12 posted on 05/03/2004 2:20:55 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Here's the abstract of the study, it's pretty narrowly focused as to what it examines, and what it concludes.

Objectives. We tested the premise that punishment for cannabis use deters use and thereby benefits public health.

Methods. We compared representative samples of experienced cannabis users in similar cities with opposing cannabis policies?Amsterdam, the Netherlands (decriminalization), and San Francisco, Calif (criminalization). We compared age at onset, regular and maximum use, frequency and quantity of use over time, intensity and duration of intoxication, career use patterns, and other drug use.

Results. With the exception of higher drug use in San Francisco, we found strong similarities across both cities. We found no evidence to support claims that criminalization reduces use or that decriminalization increases use.

Conclusions. Drug policies may have less impact on cannabis use than is currently thought.

13 posted on 05/03/2004 2:50:55 PM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
But it's not a valid or serious conclusion based on what the study actually did. To determine the effects of legalization, you have to look at levels of use before and after in one place. Otherwise, you fail to control for all the other possible reasons San Franciscans are more or less likely to use pot than the Dutch. For example, SF may well start out with much higher use than a theoretical Amsterdam where pot use is also illegal, and it could be for altogether different reasons.
14 posted on 05/03/2004 6:10:45 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson