Posted on 05/03/2004 12:10:28 PM PDT by quidnunc
How to understand this war against globalization, which has grown in scope and virulence over the past five years? First, we must realize that it is a war in the real, not the figurative, sense of the word. It is a physical struggle being fought in the streets, not just theoretically. The demonstrators who are its shock troops are organized by activist organizations, many of them subsidized by governments, and they sack cities and lay siege to international meetings during their battles.
What motivates this extraordinary resistance? Globalization simply means freedom of movement for goods and people, and it is hard to be violently hostile to that. But behind this fight lies an older and more fundamental struggleagainst economic liberalization, and against the chief representative thereof, which is the United States. Anti-globalism carnivals often feature an Uncle Sam in a Stars-and-Stripes costume as their supreme scapegoat. In this way, the new movement taps into an old socialist tradition, where opposition to economic freedom and opposition to America are impossible to separate.
The simplistic article of Marxist faith that capitalism is absolute evil, and that it is incarnated in and directed by the United States, may be the most important principle shared by the current crop of anti-globalizers. America is the object of their loathing because for a half century or more it has been the most prosperous and creative capitalist society on earth. But ultimately it is something even bigger that the anti-globalizers want to destroy: liberal democracy and free-market economics. Or quite simply liberty itself.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at taemag.com ...

From Publishers Weekly Review: 
His latest book, a bestseller in France, comes at a crucial time. It seeks to explain the root cause of the world's and particularly Europe's obsession with hating America. He does not pretend that America is perfect. But he argues that the daily denunciations exceed the bounds of reasonable criticism. Furthermore, Revel says, European critics are quick to point fingers when they should be looking in the mirror. Rather than mock America's 2000 presidential election, he notes, Europeans should have been examining their own abysmally run European Union. He attributes such inconsistencies to Europeans' desperate desire to "project our faults onto America so as to absolve ourselves." Revel further finds fault with the antiglobalization movement. Though the movement claims to oppose inequality and poverty in underdeveloped countries, its true anathema is liberal capitalism, whose chief representative is the United States. The barrage of attacks will make it impossible for the United States to confer with European officials or take any criticism seriously. It is in Europe's interest, Revel says, to put aside its envy and consider a more constructive relationship with the United States. As a French citizen, the author laments the sorry state of his home country; he believes that careful consideration of American principles will strengthen Europe. Revel writes with a style at once informative and incisive. He possesses a sarcastic wit that is undoubtedly as irritating to his critics as it is endearing to his supporters.
Their floating mass of some hundreds of thousands of demonstrators is their compensation for the frustration of having seen all the socialisms and all the revolutions fail. At a time when they have no positive alternative, yelling slogans and trashing cities and blocking international gatherings provide them with the illusion of moral action.
 It's too bad they can't channel all that energy for the good of their country.
 UN/IMF/WTO Supranational Institutional Socialist Globalization: Bad
To write that, Globalization 'simply' means 'freedom' of movement", simply is NOT so. To write that "Anti-Globalism = Anti-Americanism" shows a complete lack of knowledge of American History.Guys, The above is a rebuttal to this typical Frenchman's understanding of "Americanism". And it would seem a few "conservatives" on FR. Not to mention Washington's words about not getting involved in foreign entanglements. Peace and love, George.The U.S. of A. Constitution states in Article 1 section 9 paragraph 5 that, "No Tax or Duty shall be laid on any Article exported from any State". And in Article 1 section 10 paragraph 2 that, "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports,....". THAT is "Americanism".
NOT the thousands upon thousands of pages detailing exactly when, why, and what may be traded and exactly who may be licensed to conduct trade between nations that present and proposed "agreements" {treaties} already in the pipeline.
==================================================
THAT SAID IT ALL.
 TP, Ah-YUP! Peace and love, George.
Can't be said often enough: the fundamental ideology of Europe is envy. That's what gave the world Marxism and Naziism.
 (Compare Euro hate-America-ism with its virtual absence in important Asian countries.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.