Skip to comments.
A Kerry Landslide?
Washington Monthly ^
| 4/6/04
| Todd
Posted on 05/05/2004 5:46:10 AM PDT by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: pabianice
Well here's 7 yrs in college
41
posted on
05/05/2004 6:51:53 AM PDT
by
petercooper
(We did not have to prove Saddam had WMD, he had to prove he didn't.)
To: pabianice
I heard this speech before. I think it ends with the phrase "Did American's give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor".
To: Redcoat LI; VisualizeSmallerGovernment
Haven't heard a thing about Kerry's "Middle Class Misery Index" since the day it was released. Even the partisan press couldn't push it.
43
posted on
05/05/2004 6:53:19 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: ilgipper
Let them believe that - they're obviously surrounded by typical hate-mongers out of touch with middle America. The more over-confident they are, the less likely they'll "Torcc" him.
44
posted on
05/05/2004 6:54:50 AM PDT
by
Tigercap
To: Rick.Donaldson
I am certain that one reason Bush is raising such a huge war chest ($400M?) is that he is creating two separate sets of campaign material: one against Kerry and one against Hillary. Bush is not going to be taken by surprise if a Dem convention knock-down drag-out nominates Hillary.
I still laugh every time I remember what one service buddy told me about Hillary's visit to Iraq. Without exception, every helicopter and jet she commandeered in Iraq for her 'royal visit' was unofficially referred to as "Broomstick One."
To: pabianice
Well, the mainstream news media will do their best toto to make this becomes true...
46
posted on
05/05/2004 6:55:14 AM PDT
by
Libertina
(Democrats are to lies as "dog years" are to Spot. Many.)
To: pabianice
In an early April Gallup poll, Kerry trailed Bush 46 percent to 48 percent among likely voters, but led 48 percent to 46 percent among registered voters. Kerry's support had dropped incrementally in a late April Gallup poll, but he continued to garner higher support among registered voters than likely voters.This is a classic example of twisting negative facts for your candidate to make them look as favorable as possible. Why, he's not behind, he's doing, well, better! I believe the technical term for this is putting lipstick on a pig.
To: pabianice
Translation.......
Party fund raising has fallen off and we need to get that cash flowing again.
48
posted on
05/05/2004 6:56:49 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
To: alnick
I've bookmarked this article with a note to e-mail the author in November, After Dubya's landslide, just to rub it in.I like the way you think. Comparing GWB to Carter now are they? Chucky Todd is so whacked-out on something here, but I'll bet they're lapping it up at DU.
If JfK is so popular, why am I hearing that few people come out to his campaign rallies? Contrast that with the 10,000 who came out to see the president in MI on Monday night and 10,000 in Ohio last night. Ha!
49
posted on
05/05/2004 7:05:14 AM PDT
by
ride the whirlwind
(We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
To: Verginius Rufus
I knew Asinius Gallus. Asinius Gallus was a friend of mine. John Kerry's no Asinius Gallus. Don't question Asinius Gallus' patriotism, buddy! Where were YOU at the Battle of Actium?
To: not2worry
George W. Bush talks straight from the heart. Kerry babbles so much he gives me a brain cramp. It's the nuance.
To: pabianice
I got to the "soft economic recovery" bit, and stopped reading.
52
posted on
05/05/2004 7:10:59 AM PDT
by
dawn53
To: pabianice
What happens when you spend 8 years in college smoking dope. I think Todd has moved on to the peyote buttons.
53
posted on
05/05/2004 7:16:44 AM PDT
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: pabianice
Were you by any chance smoking dope when you wrote this?
54
posted on
05/05/2004 7:23:22 AM PDT
by
texasflower
(in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
To: texasflower; pabianice
Oops, I guess you didn't write this! Sorry!
55
posted on
05/05/2004 7:26:51 AM PDT
by
texasflower
(in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
Inflation will beincreasingly noticeable before the election because it is in the system. We have been inflating for a couple of years now. Up to now the extra dollars have all been washing out to Europe but they are coming back. It is not something that can be fixed quickly and the main reason for the Carter inflation (which was begun with Nixon) were the continuing attempts to bring it under control by short fixes and patches. When those fixes seemed to have no effect because it takes the whole 40 acres to turn this rig around- at least several quarters- more fixes were put in and ultimately made it all much worse.
The "devaluation" effected by W is the very stuff of inflation and we are beginning to feel it now. The price of oil will not come back down because the dollar is cheaper and it simply takes more of them to equal the same value that oil producers were receiving before.
Look at the prices in the supermarket. Most are climbing and the cheap storebrands are disappearing. The prices in the surplus bread stores are not so much less than in the Winn Dixie anymore and are higher than the grocery store prices were a few months ago. This is the beginning of it and all prices do not rise in the beginning. Computers are still cheap and cars have not gone up but they will.
If W's treasury and Fed take the necessary steps now to fix it, prices will keep going up right through the election before they stabilize and that will not gain W any advantage for November, so it will not be done. Fixing it after a W win will cause short term pain and appear to complicate the war effort so it will not be fixed.
Remember, W is a self avowed Keynesian, albeit a "conservative" Keynesian who will make the typical Keynesian errors (that are not errors to a "liberal" Keynesian because they keep the society off balance and easier to bring under government controls on everything.
If Kerry is elected he will replicate Carter in that his administration will pour fuel on the inflationary fire trying in futility to tinker and adjust the economy. It will cost him reelection but whatever the outcome in November we are in for 70s redux for a long time to come.
56
posted on
05/05/2004 7:27:44 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: battousai
There is one superficially valid comparison of Carter to W. Both will have presided over strongly inflationary economies. This, however is not exact because Bush has started the serious inflation this time around while Carter was merely enthusiastically building on the inflation that Nixon launched.
Keynesians will nearly always bring us inflation. Reagan was the only non Keynesian president we have had since Kennedy (who was a Keynesian in his schooling but but more practical in his application).JFK recognized some truth about taxes and brought us highly productive tax cuts. Reagan was hard core "supply side" oriented and brought us 15 years or so of prosperity and no inflation.
57
posted on
05/05/2004 7:36:00 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: fqued
Kerry is a very wealthy elitistSo were both Roosevelts and JFK.
58
posted on
05/05/2004 7:37:45 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: pabianice
Maybe it is because I am 68 and very cynical about the dumbed down lemming boob American public but ANY THING IS POSSIBLE
Didn't a DORK like Gore get the popular vote last time around and if you add in NADER's vote the country went LEFT WING and if it wasn't for NADER Gore would be president
If it wasn't for the Iran Crisis Carter probably would have been re-elected
The American public by and large is the most ill-informed
pack of boobs who know more about football baseball etc than their reps in congress or presidential candidates and most of their knowledge comes from the left wing controlled TV
As far as economics they haven't the faintest clue about anythiong
59
posted on
05/05/2004 7:38:35 AM PDT
by
uncbob
To: Phantom Lord
The fact that according to Kerry's "Misery Index" the Carter Economy was Better than the Reagan economy made it worth ignoring.
60
posted on
05/05/2004 7:40:15 AM PDT
by
Redcoat LI
("help to drive the left one into the insanity.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson