Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beelzebubba
Or better yet, let the buyer decide what is reasonable and safe. Setting a minimum price is not letting the market decide.
11 posted on 05/06/2004 1:28:16 PM PDT by On the Road to Serfdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: On the Road to Serfdom
Or better yet, let the buyer decide what is reasonable and safe.

Exactly! Gun dealers will be the best suited to determine which weapons are junk and unsafe and which are simply reliable, low-cost alternatives for citizens on a budget.

Firearms that do not sell after 2-3 auction cycles could then be determined to be "junk" and disposed properly.

12 posted on 05/06/2004 1:56:33 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: On the Road to Serfdom
Or better yet, let the buyer decide what is reasonable and safe. Setting a minimum price is not letting the market decide.


You are absolutely right. My proposal was a practical way to implement the political desire not to have unsafe guns sold by this process.
16 posted on 05/06/2004 4:15:31 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson