[ought-six]

"No WMDs. Many dead Americans. But no WMDs."

Ummm...Saddam Hussein himself was a weapon of mass destruction. However, he did have the more tangible kind, like chemicals and biologicals, and was sure looking into the nuclears: Even the U.N. and the appeaser nations admitted it; they just didn't agree on what to do about it. You are anti-war, but I wonder if you are selective in your bias? Did you loudly and soundly protest and oppose the Clinton misadventure in the Balkans? I wonder.

[wku man]

"Ummm...Saddam Hussein himself was a weapon of mass destruction."

No he wasn't. He was a tyrant, a sadist, a torturer, a mass murderer, and evil incarnate, but he wasn't a weapon. Exaggeration doesn't help our side one bit, it just gets gets us accused of "right wing spin".

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!