Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eala
Damn russians - anyhow, the resolution was very strong.. have you read it in it's entirity?????
5 posted on 05/07/2004 6:16:39 PM PDT by faludeh_shirazi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: faludeh_shirazi
Yes, right down to the erroneous translation of "(8)" into "(". Nice words, but it doesn't seem to really demand specific actions, other than "calling for" them. (OTOH, I'm not much familiar with "binding" vs. "non-binding" resolutions).
11 posted on 05/07/2004 6:28:18 PM PDT by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: faludeh_shirazi
Russia builds energy reactor. One cann't use it for produce nuclier weapon. It is impossible.
You have to know that there are military nuclier and civilian nuclier.
Russia don't help no one with military nuclier and fulfill her obligations.
Civilian nuclier is different matter.
If Russia stops to fulfil her contract with Iran then she will have penalties for abrogation of contract. WHo will pay those losses? United States Congress? It sould be if it votes such resolution.
27 posted on 05/08/2004 9:05:52 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson