Skip to comments.
The U.S. Jobless Recovery Is Jobless No More: Caroline Baum
Bloomberg ^
| 05/07/04
| Bloomberg
Posted on 05/08/2004 11:28:05 AM PDT by Pikamax
Edited on 07/19/2004 2:14:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The U.S. Jobless Recovery Is Jobless No More: Caroline Baum May 7 (Bloomberg) -- So the nation's purchasing managers had it right after all.
For months, the closely watched manufacturing index from the Institute for Supply Management has been heralding a revival in manufacturing employment. The ISM employment index broke above 50, the dividing line between expansion and contraction, in November, rising to a 16-year high of 57.8 in April.
(Excerpt) Read more at quote.bloomberg.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushrecovery; joblessrecovery; jobmarket; jobs; thebusheconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
1
posted on
05/08/2004 11:28:05 AM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax; Willie Green
Willie Green is deeply saddened.
2
posted on
05/08/2004 11:32:16 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: Pikamax
``Manufacturers were adding to payrolls with the workweek at a lower level than before,'' says Joe Carson, director of global economic research at Alliance Capital Management. ``It makes no sense,'' especially in light of the strength in factory shipments in March, which were up 3.8 percent.
Maybe the manufacturers are gearing up for anticipated growth in demand and don't want to be left flatfooted when the orders start rolling in.
3
posted on
05/08/2004 11:33:53 AM PDT
by
USNBandit
(Florida military absentee voter number 537. Just registered there to avoid state taxes.)
To: Pikamax
Goldman, Sachs & Co. economists, steadfast in their view of no Fed tightening until mid-2005, were among the last to throw in the towel. ``Our view of no Fed tightening and lower bond yields in 2004 has become untenable,'' Goldman wrote in a note to clients following today's report. ``We now expect the FOMC to raise its fed funds target by a cumulative 100 basis points to 2 percent by year-end, probably starting with a 25 basis-point hike at the June 29-30 FOMC meeting.''
And the RATs will be screaming about rising interest rates without acknowledging the fact that the reason for it blew their "jobless recovery" argument out of the water.
4
posted on
05/08/2004 11:43:32 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(Islamic populations have more in common w/ Radical Islam than the mainstream media has with America)
To: Pikamax
While manufacturers are hiring again, primarily in durable goods industries, after 42 consecutive months of job cuts, curiously they cut back on employee hours in April, according to today's employment report. The manufacturing workweek fell 0.3 hours to 40.6 hours. Generally businesses add employees when they can't keep up with the order flow by working the existing staff longer hours. There comes a point of diminished returns on that policy and likely they have reached it. It is called over time.
When you are fairly sure that orders are going to stay up it makes more sense to hire another seven people then continue to pay 20 ten hours a week of time and a half.
Production also goes up once you get past the training curve. Which you want to do before production picks up dramatically.
5
posted on
05/08/2004 11:45:50 AM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Unionized employees are like broken guns, they won't work and you can't fire them)
To: Pikamax
All the factories in my county closed down last year. All four of them.
So when I hear that "factories are hiring", it doesn't mean a helluva lot to me.
And of course, nobody is hiring engineers anywhere that I can see. (Real engineers, not symbol manipulators.)
But Burger King does have a sign out front, so this article is probably right. Aren't hamburgers considered durable goods now?
6
posted on
05/08/2004 11:46:53 AM PDT
by
snopercod
(I used to be disgusted. Then I became amused. Now I'm disgusted again.)
To: snopercod
The ones I eat seem to linger awhile. Making them also count as manufacturing jobs don't they?
7
posted on
05/08/2004 11:52:21 AM PDT
by
Arkie2
To: Arkie2
Well, I promised myself that I wouldn't whine any more on these threads.
8
posted on
05/08/2004 11:55:58 AM PDT
by
snopercod
(I used to be disgusted. Then I became amused. Now I'm disgusted again.)
To: snopercod
Hey, after making me cry about building my house you expect sympathy? ;-)
9
posted on
05/08/2004 12:02:43 PM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: snopercod
So .... CHANGE!!! Buggy whip factories are in few supply today. If you are an engineer .. change to what the work force needs. Rocket science REALLY is pretty simple.
But then again, it is easier to b**ch about something than do something ....
Buttttt I cannnn'ttttt (in Atilla the Ned's most whiny voice.....)
To: snopercod
So when I hear that "factories are hiring", it doesn't mean a helluva lot to me. Geez I guess it's all false.
11
posted on
05/08/2004 12:05:02 PM PDT
by
lasereye
To: HiramQuick
change to what the work force needsSorry, I have to much self-respect to become a lawyer or a politician.
12
posted on
05/08/2004 12:11:04 PM PDT
by
snopercod
(I used to be disgusted. Then I became amused. Now I'm disgusted again.)
To: DB
You'll thank me someday...
13
posted on
05/08/2004 12:11:37 PM PDT
by
snopercod
(I used to be disgusted. Then I became amused. Now I'm disgusted again.)
To: snopercod
to=too
14
posted on
05/08/2004 12:11:58 PM PDT
by
snopercod
(I used to be disgusted. Then I became amused. Now I'm disgusted again.)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Exactly, why run an overtime shift when you are meeting the demand by adding employees, not curious at all.
15
posted on
05/08/2004 12:13:30 PM PDT
by
Camel Joe
(Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
To: Pikamax
...rising to a 16-year high Bears repeating.
To: Pikamax
Is pat buchanan under a suicide watch?
To: snopercod
Might I suggest "MOVING TO WHERE THE JOBS ARE"!!! Reminds me of Bad Sammy's routine on the starving Ethiopians. Just move to where the food is.
18
posted on
05/08/2004 12:19:13 PM PDT
by
Camel Joe
(Proud Uncle of a Fine Young Marine)
To: Camel Joe
It isn't just a wage issue. A lot of people don't like working overtime. They want to put in their eight hours and go home. You can get them to put in a few extra hours here and there but you do it long enough on a regular basis and you have a resentful unhappy employee.
My factory is a food facility, resentful unhappy employees can be our worse nightmare.
19
posted on
05/08/2004 12:37:50 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Unionized employees are like broken guns, they won't work and you can't fire them)
To: Camel Joe
Might I suggest "MOVING TO WHERE THE JOBS ARE"!!!If I can't have the job I want, at the pay I want, in the place I want, then we're in an economic catastrophe. BUY GOLD!!!!
20
posted on
05/08/2004 12:39:08 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(We are at war with them. We are not them.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson