Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesnuffy
Rumsfeld said he took "FULL RESPONSIBILITY" in last week's congressional hearings.

To remove Rumsfeld would be a huge political victory for the Dems in a critical election cycle and would occur purely on political grounds motivated only to remove the Bush administration from office.

The resulting effect would be Kerry succeeding as the Commander In Chief - UNNACCEPTABLE solution.

14 posted on 05/10/2004 5:28:53 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Happy2BMe

To remove Rumsfeld would be a huge political victory for the Dems in a critical election cycle and would occur purely on political grounds motivated only to remove the Bush administration from office.

It's even more than that. It would set a precedent giving the military a huge load of ammo to fire at any SecDef. Don't like the boss? Send a mission of a few renegade soldiers out to create a scandal and take the boss down. To remove a SecDef over a scandal like this one would result in giving the military way too big a potential club & would be a huge blow to civilian control of the military.

22 posted on 05/10/2004 6:00:24 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson