Skip to comments.
Cornell Rejects Academic Freedom
FPM ^
| May 7, 2004
| Joe Sabia
Posted on 05/10/2004 3:38:17 PM PDT by swilhelm73
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: weegee
A choice between hearing Clinton at the 2004 Cornell Commencencement or jumping off the Gorge:
41
posted on
05/11/2004 7:17:36 AM PDT
by
Helms
(Jesse Jackson has been unsuccessfully successful)
To: Helms
To be fair, X-42 will be the convocation speaker, not the commencement speaker, so his talk will be quite easily avoided.
42
posted on
05/11/2004 8:39:02 AM PDT
by
Fixit
(My Pitiful Blog - http://comedian.blogspot.com)
To: Fixit
Thanks, how long winded do you think he will be in turning this into a Legacy Rehab Event? There is a good reason Cornell has been chosen.
43
posted on
05/11/2004 9:03:00 AM PDT
by
Helms
(Jesse Jackson has been unsuccessfully successful)
To: ontos-on; ggordon22
gg: i tend to agree with ontos:
if the socialists at cornell (my alma mater and employer)
were truly interested in academic freedom, and the major
objection to the "six points" were that the language was
"too targeted" - they could have easily added phrases
specifying "government interference", "corporate" and other conflict, "the sciences", etc.
that is not the approach they took. they wished to make it
clear that academic freedom is not needed at cornell.
that's the way it is, and the way they like it.
44
posted on
05/11/2004 9:47:50 AM PDT
by
AFPhys
((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
To: Helms
He probably just sees it as the first stop on his book tour, assuming he finishes writing it on time.
45
posted on
05/11/2004 11:51:22 AM PDT
by
Fixit
(My Pitiful Blog - http://comedian.blogspot.com)
To: ggordon22
Academic freedom is vital to a university's intellectual culture. When it comes from a genuinely nonpartisan source, then there can be a healthy discussion.According to the left, the ONLY non-partisan source is another leftist. Conservatives have NO chance to get a fair hearing at most large universities today because their administrations are SOLIDLY in the hands of leftists, and those who drift toward Student Government also trend leftward.
46
posted on
05/11/2004 1:17:04 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: AFPhys
oh...I think this needs taking one step further....these clowns IMHO, are reveling in the taking of such freedoms from their fellow Americans at their school...and daring them to do something about it..pretty darn near fightin' words...seems a case for FIRE (Foundation for Indivisual Rights in Education-
http://www.thefire.org/index.php
47
posted on
05/11/2004 6:52:19 PM PDT
by
mo
To: Unam Sanctam
I'd never actually read this Academic Bill of Rights. The principles seem so eminently reasonable, I don't see how anyone could possibly find them objectionable.The left finds diversity of opinion objectionable. Propaganda only works if you drown out all dissenting ideas.
48
posted on
05/14/2004 5:58:39 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest; bentfeather; gaspar; NativeNewYorker; drjimmy; Atticus; John Valentine; ...
To: Behind Liberal Lines
50
posted on
05/28/2004 6:00:26 AM PDT
by
Soaring Feather
(~The Dragon Flies' Lair~ Poetry and Prose~)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson