Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyborg
Plus with all the sluts giving up for free, why bother roping oneself to one woman for life?

Interesting that you should use that collective noun. My sixteen year old son uses the exact same word for his female contemporaries - which even shocks me somewhat.The feminists appear to want to turn women into pseudo-males which not suprisingly is not appealing to heterosexual males.

In an ideal world, lifelong monogamy yields the most psychological, emotional and spiritual benefits to both partners but thanks to the feminists, women have been awakened to the danger of male oppression and can now live "liberated" lives.( The fact that women own a substantial majority of the assets in the USA seemed to have escaped their notice)

24 posted on 05/11/2004 8:17:53 AM PDT by Timocrat (I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Timocrat
I wrote a very hostile letter to the editor of Cosmopolitan Magazine demanding to know WHY their American edition is so filthy but British edition Cosmo isn't. Sex in the City was supposed to be liberating? GIVE ME A BREAK. I feel sorry for young people today. It's so blatant and in your face.
26 posted on 05/11/2004 8:25:46 AM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson