[Peach]

Why do you think Freepers won't like the big story stemming from this matter?

[MineralMan]

"Why do you think Freepers won't like the big story stemming from this matter?"

Are you kidding? OK, let's assume that the story is true and that Berg ends up being linked with the terrorists. How is that going to play? I don't know that to be true, of course, so I'm just playing with the idea.

If Berg is linked with the terrorists, then his beheading may be for other reasons than stated in the video.

Again, time is going to play this out, but it's strange, indeed.

[aft_lizard]

If our worst suspicians come out and it turns out Berg was an enabler for ANSWER and the terrorists then we all should be pissed at all the emotion spent in anger. On the otherhand if Berg turns out to be CIA we all should remain angry. this may sound like a double standard but I have no sympathy for enablers.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Why do you think Freepers won't like the big story stemming from this matter?

Can we be truthful here? Given the fact that this guy and his family are Jewish, and his Dad is blaming the President of the United States, and now it's learned that he may *possibly* have ties with terrorist?

Don't look real good, that's for dang sure. LOL!

[justanotherday]

Does this smack of the usual "intelligence" subterfuge? Plant conflicting stories, confuse the rubes, get the "right wing" folks knickers in a twist with no clear outcome? Add the Mossad, CIA, and AQ, we got us a Tom Clancy novel in the making.