Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/13/2004 8:05:28 PM PDT by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: MikeA

Many people here in south florida also voted in the northeast. They are seasonal and always vote in both states. Absentee in 1 and in person in the other.


2 posted on 05/13/2004 8:13:52 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

my wife works for a large trial lawyer firm, big dems, and said they already have lawsuit papers drawn up for election day. They are already waiting to try and steal this election again. Blocking military votes etc.


3 posted on 05/13/2004 8:17:29 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

You really ought to post links to articles for some of these stories.


4 posted on 05/13/2004 8:18:07 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Hey libs, would you like some Kool-Aid to go along with your candidate's waffles?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
First, there was no illegal Democrat voter fraud in 2000. It was legal because, well, insofar as I can tell, no one got prosecuted for it. I'm not sure how or if the military will be able to vote in 2004. They probably gave up the franchise when they enlisted, and as for those at home, their ballots may be "decreed for Kerry."

The deceased have the right to vote; otherwise, it is discrimination based upon age and previous condition of servitude. The deceased must support Democrats.

Most urban people support Democrats because city folk are more enlightened than country hicks. They just love Kerry. And Kerry cannot win without these French-speaking urbane sophisticates.

And did you hear that Kerry served in Vietnam? That'll get him on the fast track to the White House--just like ex-Presidents Dukakis and Dole.

Of course none of this is true. But the Democrats think it is--and that's what counts.

On a more serious note, do you remember all the people killed on 11 September 2001? If the answer is "no" for anywhere close to a majority of voters (including the deceased and terrorist votes), as it is among journalists, Bush surely shall lose. And that is what I fear. Cue Woorley.
5 posted on 05/13/2004 8:19:39 PM PDT by dufekin (John F. Kerry. Irrational, improvident, backward, seditious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
Republicans missed big opportunity.

Should have put a few people in jail, make them think twice before they do it again.

also quit appeasing the illegal aliens. Round them and send them home
6 posted on 05/13/2004 8:22:04 PM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

Remember when Rush talked to the man who invented the punch card voting system and he said that the only way to achieve a hanging chad was to attempt to push the pin through FOUR cards?

I lived in OH, always used punchcard voting and knew that the pin used was an inch long. How the crap did anyone have a pregnant chad?


7 posted on 05/13/2004 8:24:31 PM PDT by netmilsmom (For Tali Hatuel, her son & daughters Tehila, 11; Hadar, 9; Roni, 7; and Meirav, 2 - Kill Arafat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

I would love to send this out in emails, but wish you had some links for your sources.


8 posted on 05/13/2004 8:33:31 PM PDT by potlatch ( Medals do not make a man. Morals do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

Our Attorney General lost the senatorial election in Missouri because of vote fraud in St. Louis/St. Louis County.

The dims will do it over and over again because they have learned there are no consequences.


11 posted on 05/13/2004 8:36:36 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

What exactly is an "Emassung from AOL"?


12 posted on 05/13/2004 8:45:51 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (06/07/04 - 1000 days since 09/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mhking; rdb3; Sabertooth; JohnHuang2; MeekOneGOP; onyx; section9; 4mycountry; jriemer; archy; ...

plenty here for everyone. ping those you think will be interested, thanks.

a question for all and sundry: how do we, the People, combat this crap this coming November?


13 posted on 05/13/2004 8:47:37 PM PDT by King Prout (jihadis want to kill all of us, always have, always will, no matter how nice we treat them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
There was funny business in St. Louis and maybe elsewhere in Missouri. Some polls were kept open a couple of hours late and I think they also had some college students confess to voting twice.

I heard a girl on the streets of Boston confess to a friend that she voted twice (I overheard her in Sept 2001). She said she did it because she "knew" that they would need every vote. Nothing I could do. I had no evidence. Purely heard her word. "He said-she said". I didn't even know who she was nor she me.

Remember these stolen votes pushed Gore into his 0.52% lead of the "popular vote". Even the contested absentee ballots in Florida don't figure into that total (although the court did approve their inclusion, the were not added to the certified total).

14 posted on 05/13/2004 8:51:49 PM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS. CNN ignored torture & murder in Saddam's Iraq to keep their Baghdad Bureau.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

Those,"Unite'ers and not divide'ers", encourage vote fraud because they have no backbone.. With vote fraud and treason being defacto legal today. Those two items are merely symptoms. A full discloser of the disease is hinted at in Ann Coulters two books, "Treason" and "Slander".


16 posted on 05/13/2004 8:59:01 PM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

BUMP


19 posted on 05/13/2004 9:30:41 PM PDT by fly_so_free (Never under estimate the treachery of the democrat party-Save USA vote a dem out of office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
Oregon had approximately 36,000 ballots with bogus signatures. Gore operatives posed as campaign workers at a Bush rally and destroyed thousands of ballots.

Can someone interpret this in english. How do you destroy ballots at a campaign rally?

21 posted on 05/13/2004 9:32:58 PM PDT by breakem ((formerly bigsigh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

Good rant!

Remember - - it is not only welfare parasites, athiests, abortion enthusiasts, condom throwers, screeching feminists, and lazy socialist malcontents who elect Democrats. There are also many otherwise normal Americans who work and pay taxes, yet vote Democrat, most likely out of sheer stupidity. But not THAT many.

As the famous blue-red, county-by-county post-election map graphically demonstrated, Democrat votes anre heavily concentrated int he nation's parasite nests (cities) while Republicans control the great expanses of traditional America. Since the Democrats have the bulk of their base concentrated in the corrupt parasite nests, vote fraud is considerably easier to get away with. And the Democrats surely understand that without significant vote fraud, they do not stand a chance in mosttewide and national elections.

Sure as the sun come up, the scumbag Democrats will be at it again.


22 posted on 05/13/2004 9:38:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zip; BOBWADE

ping


24 posted on 05/13/2004 10:04:36 PM PDT by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

This stuff is ON GOING

Here is a 2 hour old article from FOX NEWS



Voting ID Requirements Raise Concerns


Friday, May 14, 2004

PHOENIX — To buy a beer, rent a movie or board a plane, identification must be shown. But for voting, most states don't bother requiring Americans to flash ID.


In the last presidential election (search), just 11 states required identification to vote, while four states made it optional. In 36 states, all a voter had to do was sign a page or say his or her name.

In the wake of the 2000 election, lawmakers in 25 states introduced legislation tightening ID procedures. But in most cases, reform efforts failed because of partisan politics.

Democrats argue that verification requirements disenfranchise immigrants and those unlikely to carry an ID, like the homeless. Republicans argue that a photo ID is the best way to reduce fraud.

"One of the dirty little secrets about voter ID: It is truly intended to keep minorities and poor people from going to the polls," said Arizona Democratic state Rep. Steve Gallardo (search).

A bill in Arizona to require ID to be shown is expected to pass, but the state's Democratic governor has already threatened a veto. Similar bills in Kansas and Iowa were already vetoed by Democratic governors.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,119891,00.html


25 posted on 05/13/2004 10:11:46 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

I don't doubt for a minute that democrats are crooks and vote thieves but you are tossing around a lot of numbers without providing sources.


28 posted on 05/13/2004 10:34:43 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
A good election system should provide a means by which one can ensure statistically that there's a 99.9% correlation between paper ballots cast and ballots recorded (with the ability to refine it to 99.99% in really close elections).

To date, none I've seen provide a means of ensuring a one-to-one correlation between the paper ballots and the recorded votes. I wonder why?

29 posted on 05/13/2004 10:49:28 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
...150,000 voting ID's were mailed to legal aliens ineligible to vote in California

What the heck is a 'voting ID?' In California, you tell them your name and address, they cross you off the list and have you sign a page and give you the ballot.

We're in the land of liberal insanity -- they'd remove the requirement for stating your name give a quarter of a chance.

Some items on the list ring true, others sound like Internet swag gleened from e-mails. In any event, careful watching of the polls, especially noting the RAT vans, is the key to preventing stolen elections.
33 posted on 05/14/2004 9:28:08 AM PDT by kingu (Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson