Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rabbi Elyashiv: No Wigs From India
Israel National News ^ | 14:31 May 14, '04 / 23 Iyar 5764 | Israel National News

Posted on 05/14/2004 5:20:10 AM PDT by USMMA_04

Rabbi Yosef Sholom Elyashiv, considered the top Halakhic [Jewish legal] authority in most religious Jewish circles, has added his name to those banning the use and benefit of all human hair wigs originating in India.

The decision is based on confirmed reports that human hair in India is often shaved off for the purpose of idol worship practices, and is afterwards sold to companies that manufacture wigs. Although there is no certainty that any specific Indian-made wig is made of hair used for idol-worship, the widespread practice there means that each individual wig involves at least a "possible" violation of the Torah ban on benefiting from idol worship, and may therefore not be used. Rabbi Elyashiv said that his ruling does not imply that wigs in general are appropriate as head-coverings, and that on this issue, each woman should follow her rabbis' instructions and her own family customs.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: idolatory; idolworship; india; islam; israel; jews; judaism; outsourcing; pagan; pakistan; sheitel; wig

1 posted on 05/14/2004 5:20:12 AM PDT by USMMA_04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: USMMA_04

Arthur Carlson of WKRP once sent 20,000 blonde wigs to the victims of a Nicarauguan earthquake.


2 posted on 05/14/2004 5:31:22 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

We should take a page out of the WKRP script and drop 20000 pigs across FULLALOOSAHS.........

Or How 'bout a CROP DUSTER loaded with BACON FAT..........


3 posted on 05/14/2004 5:43:19 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberty in the pursuit of vices is NOT extremism.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USMMA_04

One man's idol is another man's god.


4 posted on 05/14/2004 5:47:01 AM PDT by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Porkers for Peace?


5 posted on 05/14/2004 5:50:55 AM PDT by Karlos_Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Karlos_Marx

No, More like FAT FOR THE FATWAH..........


6 posted on 05/14/2004 5:53:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (Liberty in the pursuit of vices is NOT extremism.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator; 1st-P-In-The-Pod; 2sheep; 7.62 x 51mm; A Jovial Cad; a_witness; adam_az; af_vet_rr; ..
This is not good news. Most moderately-priced sheitels are made from Indian or Asian (Chinese and Korean) hair. A sheitel made from European hair can cost $2000 and more.

Well, just damn. Maybe this is a Muslim plot to force Jewish women to wear hijab?

FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel ping list.

WARNING: This is a high volume ping list

7 posted on 05/14/2004 6:05:54 AM PDT by Alouette (Pray for the IDF and the USA--see my profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Rabbi Elyashiv said that his ruling does not imply that wigs in general are appropriate as head-coverings ...

What's this mean? If a wig is not appropriate, is he saying that women should all wear hats or something (like hijab)?

8 posted on 05/14/2004 6:14:43 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I can see you, but you can't see me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dave Elias

One man's idol is another man's god.
___________________

Judaism has got to be the most idolatry free religion


9 posted on 05/14/2004 6:45:23 AM PDT by dennisw (Exposing John Kerry--> Swift Boat Veterans for Truth---> http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

No, he's saying you can wear wigs made of hair that isn't from India, or synthetic wigs, if you like.


10 posted on 05/14/2004 7:33:38 AM PDT by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
Maybe it was a typo in the article, and meant to say:

his ruling does not imply that wigs in general are INappropriate as head-coverings

11 posted on 05/14/2004 7:47:35 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I can see you, but you can't see me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson