How do you know that they were interrogators? I watched the Cal Thomas interview last night on Fox with Florida democrat Senator Bill Nelson. Nelson said that one of the photos provided for the Senators special viewing there were soldiers that had been cropped out on the photo that has been widely shown. The widely shown photos most likely came from those who want to shift blame away from the MPs. Nelson in typical democrat fashion wants the world to believe that President Bush is responsible for the “torture” of the prisoners and concludes that these cropped out soldiers warranted further investigation into involvement of higher ups. Frankly I was disappointed that Thomas did not ask him who he thought those cropped out soldiers might be but for some reason he let the matter drop. Other Senators have said that the same faces keep appearing in the Senate photos inferring that the MPs are the only ones involved. And now you have the admissions of MPs that they were only ones involved.
It seems to me that England is looking at jail time and lying to the military about being ordered by higher ups certainly will not be very helpful, to say the least.
It's probably related to the fact that the backgrounds of the contract interrogators is so tinfoil/black helicopter hidden by the administration. It's been speculated, with actual circumstantial evidence, that they are associated with the IDF and Shin Bet (former workers from there or who had been trained by IDF and Shin Bet). That would be explosive information in the Arab world-- that the US is allowing those with such Israeli ties to interrogate Iraqis. So, it's kept quiet.