Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transferring US troops from S.Korea ( to IRAQ ) arousing concern of local people
Xinhua News Agency. ^ | 2004-05-17 23:45:08 | www.chinaview.cn

Posted on 05/17/2004 10:13:51 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

 SEOUL, May 17 (Xinhuanet,By Wang Mian) -- Monday's proposal of the United States to move one brigade-level of its 37,000 soldiers in South Korea to Iraq aroused concern that it may be the first step of reduction of US troops in South Korea.

    Since the end of Korean War (1950-1953), the US has maintained some 37,000 troops on the Korean Peninsula. Any news about US Forces Korea (USFK) has always affected South Korean people's nerves.

    From late last year, media reports frequently quoted sources inSouth Korean or US government as saying Washington may pull out some troops here to reinforce forces in Iraq. But military authorities of the two countries both denied such "speculation."

    Monday morning, South Korean influential newspaper JongAng Daily quoted unidentified South Korean official as saying that US government plans to withdraw a brigade-level force from the 2nd Infantry Division, the most forward-deployed USFK troops near the inter-Korean border, and send it to Iraq.

    The report quickly spread in South Korean media, and eventually was partially confirmed by official of South Korean Foreign Ministry.

    Things developed quickly than expectation. Monday afternoon, South Korean Foreign Ministry said United States Deputy National Security Advisor Steve Hadley called South Korea's Foreign Minister Ban Ki-moon earlier Monday, officially asking for redeploying one brigade-level US forces here to Iraq. And Ban replied to Hadley, he "understood and agreed" with the US plan.

    Various conjectures emerged after the news announced.

    Experts discussed whether those 4,000 troops redeployed to Iraqwill return to South Korea after their missions finish. And whether the redeployment is the first-step for reduction of USFK.

    The US wants to divert some 4,000 from the 14,000-member 2nd Infantry Division, which is stationed in Dongducheon near the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) separating South Korea and the DemocraticPeople's Republic of Korea (DPRK).

    Previously, South Korea and the US agreed to retreat the 2nd Infantry Division from the area near the inter-Korean border to southern part of Seoul as part of US troops realignment plan here.

    South Korean analysts said Washington's plan to transfer 4,000 troops here to Iraq not only means the US has some shortage of forces in Iraq but also is closely linked to its long-term global strategy to realign its troop level in foreign states.

    US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld once strongly indicated that the 100,000 US troops in Japan and South Korea could be downsized as part of the American military's new global strategy, which calls for quicker troop deployment from one place to another.

    "The need to cut down the number of US troops was shown in the case of dispatch of Stryker wheeled vehicle to South Korea and its11 billion US dollars force improvement program," said Kim Il-young, a US expert at SungKyunKwan University in Seoul.

    Furthermore, some worry that any US troop reduction or temporary redeployment to Iraq could weaken South Korea's defense capability.

    "It is true that there is concern about a security vacuum with the US troops reduction, but it will be made in phases, which means the South Korean government should prepare itself for such ascenario," said Kim Chang-soo, a researcher at the (South) Korea Institute for Defense Analysis.

    Hadley also urged South Korea to accelerate the proceeding of the troop dispatch plan in telephone conversation with Ban.

    At the request of Washington, Seoul decided to dispatch 3,000 troops to Iraq besides the some 500 non-combating troops which noware working in the Middle East country. But the plan was delayed for several times in wake of deteriorating security situation and changing of deployment site.

    Recently, due to the report of abuse of Iraqi prisoners by US and Britain troops, more and more South Koran people opposed the troop dispatch plan.

    Some new lawmakers also called on Seoul to reconsider the troop dispatch plan.

    Senior officials of South Korean government insisted Seoul willcontinue preparation for the dispatch despite of such appeal. But President Roh Moo-hyun, who reinstated by Constitutional Court on last Friday, has not made clear stance over the hot issue. Enditem 


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; southkorea; troopmovement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2004 10:13:52 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; StriperSniper; Mo1; Peach; Howlin; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; ...

Oh, NOW they want us to stay........


2 posted on 05/17/2004 10:16:42 AM PDT by OXENinFLA (I nominate Tom Araya (leadsinger of SLAYER) to take over "interrogating" enemy combatants in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

did they really beleive that we would stay there forever???


3 posted on 05/17/2004 10:17:13 AM PDT by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
>>>>>Recently, due to the report of abuse of Iraqi prisoners by US and Britain troops, more and more South Koran people opposed the troop dispatch plan.

Before we yanked 4,000 troops.

>>>>>Some new lawmakers also called on Seoul to reconsider the troop dispatch plan.

Afterward. I guess they realized we weren't kidding when we asked them for 3,000 troops. I love how these host nations crap all over our shoes and then suddenly panic when we get a bellyful of their contempt and actually start moving out the troops.
4 posted on 05/17/2004 10:19:00 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Wasting away again in Margaritaville.....Not that there's much left to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

I'm all in favor of pulling our troops back, by why not from Germany first...


5 posted on 05/17/2004 10:19:23 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

We should also leave Germany .. A few years late on this endeavor.


6 posted on 05/17/2004 10:20:03 AM PDT by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Protest all you want. That's fine. Just don't whine when we leave. The arrogance is amazing. Let's us bash you but don't leave. Ha.

It's time to defend yourselves...


7 posted on 05/17/2004 10:20:20 AM PDT by dmanLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

About damned time. Let all those restless college students that make a hobby out of marching against the USA and burning our flag protect their damned border, I say bring all of our troops home. South Korea has lost most of whatever strategic value it once had.


8 posted on 05/17/2004 10:20:45 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Furthermore, some worry that any US troop reduction or temporary redeployment to Iraq could weaken South Korea's defense capability.

Yeah, no kidding. But in a post-cole-war world, why are we footing the bill for so much of South Korea's security? Especially when the people vocally don't want us there.

9 posted on 05/17/2004 10:21:21 AM PDT by prion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Yep, they hate us until we pull the suitcase out.


10 posted on 05/17/2004 10:21:27 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I'm all in favor of pulling our troops back, by why not from Germany first...

Because stirring up Korea is much more fun. };)

11 posted on 05/17/2004 10:22:13 AM PDT by OXENinFLA (I nominate Tom Araya (leadsinger of SLAYER) to take over "interrogating" enemy combatants in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

South Korea may also want to think twice about allowing train traffic in from the North.


12 posted on 05/17/2004 10:22:54 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

An ominous signal that we are preparing to nuke North Korea


13 posted on 05/17/2004 10:23:14 AM PDT by latrans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmanLA

Lets not forget that almost 1 year ago there was a pro-US march in Soul attended by over 1 million, many of whom were old vets from the Korean conflict, holding up signs stating that they are blood brothers with the US and that our blood and their was spilled together in defense of the freedom they now enjoy.

The Koreans appreciate us. It's the communists that don't.


14 posted on 05/17/2004 10:23:37 AM PDT by Peter J. Huss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
more and more South Koran people opposed the troop dispatch plan

So now there's a North Koran and a South Koran?

15 posted on 05/17/2004 10:24:01 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We don't need to provide troops for security for any nation that runs a merchandise trade surplus with the US.


16 posted on 05/17/2004 10:25:58 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Good move. After all of our troops are out of that area, we can beging to attend to Pyongyang and all of NK's little carbuncles of nuclear prolieration -- with extreme prejudice.

Now, if we'd only smarten up and pull our troops out of Western Europe, we would have the means to deal with the head of the Islamofascist snake, Saudi Arabia and their commensal colon-leeches such as France, Germany, and other haters of America.

I've posted here before about my water-for-oil program for Saudi Arabia. Deploy couple of SEAL teams or one F-17 and the games can begin...........

17 posted on 05/17/2004 10:27:48 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peter J. Huss
"Lets not forget that almost 1 year ago there was a pro-US march in Soul attended by over 1 million, many of whom were old vets from the Korean conflict, holding up signs stating that they are blood brothers with the US and that our blood and their was spilled together in defense of the freedom they now enjoy."

Heartwarming. And I wonder just how many of our kumbaya "blood brothers" are spilling their blood with us in Iraq and Afghanistan.....

18 posted on 05/17/2004 10:30:34 AM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Any chance they can pull a second brigade from Korea and put it on the border with Mexico?


19 posted on 05/17/2004 10:31:41 AM PDT by Gefreiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

"the most forward-deployed USFK troops near the inter-Korean border, and send it to Iraq..."

I thought that 4th Squadron 7th Cavalry was the Army's most forwardly deployed...a great unit...

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/4-7cav.htm


20 posted on 05/17/2004 10:36:14 AM PDT by nicko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson