Theocracy means rule by hierarchical religious officials or rules of a particular religion. It does NOT mean basing the laws of society on the general principles stemming from religion. People like to confuse the two.
So you call the fact that the majority of the people of the US do NOT want two homosexuals playing "marriage" to be legal "mob rule", but it's okay for 2-3% of the population (and many homosexuals do NOT want "gay" marriage) to shove it down the majority's throat?
You said:
"Your definition of parents, your definition of marriage, and your definition of deviancy."
Your use of falsity in arguing is getting rather tiring. The definitions I use have been in use since time immemorial and have been accepted in our country (and all others, I may add) for millenia. If you or other homosexual marriage promoting fools want to change the meanings, it's up to you to prove those meanings should change. It's not up to me or other conservatives to prove why they shouldn't be changed.
You used this phrase:
"you will fail to realize your ideal future" - this makes me wonder if you are a native English speaker (in which case you're kind of excused). Or do you just like to make verbiage salad and toss meangingless phrases around?
Maybe you've read too much psycho-babble books, or too much Herbert Marcuse.
P.S. I don't belong to a church.
And you should seriously think about stone masonry. Verbiage gets in the way, and focusing on heavy stone and sharp tools would really help focus your mind on something other than itself.
So here's a question for you: If one-ten-thousandth of a percent of the population wanted to sing praise to the goddess of frogs, and the remaining 99.999% of the population was unanimously and collectively opposed to it for reasons that it was threatening to their belief in the one true sky god, would it be OK or not OK for the frog worshippers to continue their practices?
Your use of falsity in arguing is getting rather tiring.
And your failure to argue logically is too. At the moment, I could really care less about your statements. I'd be happy with a single false argument from you. At least it would an argument.
Maybe you've read too much psycho-babble books, or too much Herbert Marcuse.
Maybe I don't so there.
P.S. I don't belong to a church.
At least you are a little more personalized from my perceptive. Are you married?
And you should seriously think about stone masonry. Verbiage gets in the way, and focusing on heavy stone and sharp tools would really help focus your mind on something other than itself.
Can I assume that you are a stone mason then? You seem to know a lot about the trade. Are you trying to recruit me?