[go star go]

weapons of mass destruction are not evidence of weopons of mass destruction. rainfall is not evidence of rainfall either. i believe blix is senile...

we found 16 shells that were designed and manufactured to hold chemical weapons but we found no evidence of wmd.

i found 42 bongs and three roach clips but no evidence of a party...

[yatros from flatwater]

Oh, and pregnancy isn't necessarily evidence of prior sexual congress.

[monkeyshine]

i found 42 bongs and three roach clips but no evidence of a party...

And that was enough to send Tommy Chong away for 9 months!

[Flightdeck]

I wish my parents had been Hans Blix.

"Honest dad, this empty bottle of Jack Daniels is no evidence whatsoever that there was once Jack Daniels in my room or that I consumed it...hic."

[Dave S]

we found 16 shells that were designed and manufactured to hold chemical weapons but we found no evidence of wmd. i found 42 bongs and three roach clips but no evidence of a party...

the relevance of these discoveries depends on when they were produced and how long they had been in their current state. If you searched through some of my old storage boxes you might find some old drug paraphenalia from the 60's. However, that is not an indication of any recent drug use.

If those shells were produced prior to Gulf War I, I doubt they prove anything other than shoddy record keeping on the part of one of Saddam's staff.