Posted on 05/18/2004 5:18:43 AM PDT by kattracks
You liken me to this? Who's got an agenda? End of discussion.
You liken me to this? Who's got an agenda? End of discussion.
You liken me to this? Who's got an agenda? End of discussion.
Why don't you place the Founding Fathers pictures up here. They wrote plenty of laws into the books.
I liken violent theocracies to each other.
Sorry if you saw yourself there, I didn't make that comparison.
Laws are good. Those that defend individual liberty and demand personal responsibility.
You did exactly that, Protagorus.
Homosexual Agenda Ping - Busy busy this AM, must ping the list.
Let me know if anyone wants on/off this list.
And there are 45 of them...
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b5f77fb6c86.htm
I think that it depends on how people look at marriage. My personal view is that I gave my word to God, my family, and my wife's family that we'd be together.
The current, more liberal, view is that marriage is a legal, non-binding contract. It provides a tax structure, benefits, inheritance rights, and so forth. When viewed solely like this, gay marriage is just a contract between two people......there could be "marriage" between, say, two sigle women that live together, or two sisters (for insurance and tax purposes).
Speaking purely for myself, the spiritual contract is far more binding than any piece of paper that I may have signed. Others obviously don't think that way.......thus a 50% divorce rate.
YOU brought your anti-libertartian screed and agenda to the thread and attacked a poster in an off topic post.
You stated a flasehood when you did.
Now you don't like what you reaped. Oh well.
Stay on topic and off personal attacks and you will have no problems.
This thread isn't about libertarians or your childish misunderstanding of what they are. It is about homosexuals pretending to be married with the blessing of liberal judges. Stay on topic, stay out of trouble.
There's always a happy median to law. That's what conservatism is. IMHO.
Bingo! Follow the money, it will lead to your pocket.
Thanks! Even a blind pig finds an occasional acorn,,,,,,,,
1933 -- The Shape of Things to Come by H.G. Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around 1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an increasing lack of public safety in "criminally infected" areas. The plan for the "Modern World-State" would succeed on its third attempt (about 1980), and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq. The book also states,
"Although world government had been plainly coming for some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition prepared anywhere."
Be careful when posting questionable material from the "Congressional Record." All that means is that a Congresscritter read the controversial piece in Congress, perhaps after hours when everyone but the C-SPAN cameraman went home.
Left to the church, gay marriage wouldn't even be discussed.
This is almost laugable. All I said was that his statements were understandable, after seeing his profile, in which he claimed to be a libertarian. How is that screed? lol. You need to lighten up friend.
My next statement showed the difference in our views based on our diferrent philosphies. If that is screed, then I'm missing something here. Neither did I ATTACK a poster. But you are entitled to your opinions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.