Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals Gamble Away Indians' Future
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | May 17, 2004 | David Yeagley

Posted on 05/18/2004 8:44:29 AM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: nickcarraway

btttttttttt


21 posted on 05/18/2004 11:47:01 AM PDT by dennisw (Mohammed wrote: "Cut off their heads, and cut off the tips of their fingers." (Sura 8:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks

They do not have to pay taxes.
Bulls**t.

There are certainly many taxes other businesses must pay which Indian businesses on "Tribal" lands DO NOT PAY.
I believe that property taxes to the respective city/county is just one item.
Payroll taxes must be adherred to IF the employee lives "OFF THE RESERVATION".

Income taxes to each state is a different issue. Each state is trying to set up their own deal.

Normal building permits, adherance to zoning, etc., falls by the wayside, as this land is now considered "Tribal lands", even if recently purchased for the sole purpose of building a casino.

Until you have had one of these monsters shoved down your throat, don't be so ignorant of the problems they drag along with the "new jobs".
Bottom line- If YOU want to build a casino, YOU WILL pay permits, go thru enviro inspections hoops, have to hire (sometimes) employees at a wage that matches local union rates, workmen's comp, insurance, and on and on and on. The regular business CANNOT compete with the "Indian" business on the same level playing field. The level playing field doesn't exist when "Indian" businesses are concerned.


22 posted on 05/18/2004 1:10:21 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Why can't I own a casino ?

There is actually a casino here is Calif that is owned by a "tribe" which consists of exactly ONE member. Not very close to the Webster's definition of a TRIBE which I grew up learning.


23 posted on 05/18/2004 1:13:42 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

As soon as you can show me, constitutionally, where the states have ANY authority over tribal lands, businesses etc... then I'll agree with you.

Until then, suck it up and get over it.


24 posted on 05/18/2004 1:48:08 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (You make me feel warm all over. No...wait...I'm soaking in a puddle of my own urine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

I'd like to see documentation on that, because personally I think you are full of crap - any tribe that had one member would have long ago lost recognition and been considered an extinct tribe.

Now, post proof.


25 posted on 05/18/2004 1:49:49 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (You make me feel warm all over. No...wait...I'm soaking in a puddle of my own urine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson