Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The hyena press: Part II
townhall.com ^ | 5/19/04 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 05/18/2004 10:10:52 PM PDT by kattracks

Two questions would destroy at least half the agenda of the political left: "Compared to what?" and "At what cost?"
 
A third question would wipe out most of the rest of the left's agenda and demolish the vision behind that agenda: "What hard evidence do you have?"

 It is not just the left's agenda on economics, race or the environment that cannot withstand a serious examination in the light of these questions. The whole current endless carrying-on in the media about prison abuses in Iraq could not stand up under these questions.

 No one defends the abuse of Iraqi prisoners or thinks that those who are guilty should get off without punishment. But compared to what?

 Senator Ted Kennedy compares what happened in the prison to what happened under Saddam Hussein, suggesting that it is the same thing, just "under American management." People in Iraq don't seem to think so -- and they know from personal experience what it was like under Saddam.

 The distinguished British magazine The Economist, despite its own editorial outrage, reports that Iraqis are not nearly as upset as Americans or Europeans, and are in fact somewhat puzzled at how we have gone ballistic over this episode.

 Whenever you have a couple of hundred thousand human beings involved in any operation, you can rest assured that there will be some absolute jackasses among them -- regardless of what country, race, religion or ideology these people come from.

 Can the others spend all their time keeping an eye on the jackasses? That brings us to our second question: "At what cost?"

 With a guerrilla and terrorist war going on in Iraq, nuclear weapons being made in North Korea, and American troops deployed in countries around the world, do those who are calling for Secretary Rumsfeld's head think that he should be trying to keep track of every sparrow's fall down at the level of individual privates and non-coms in the army?

 A colonel is lucky to know what all his second lieutenants are doing. A Secretary of Defense who knows what all the privates and non-coms are doing could only be grossly neglecting his job as Secretary of Defense. He wouldn't have enough time left to learn how to find his way around the Pentagon.

 The Bush-haters are convinced that the prison scandal could not have happened without orders from higher-ups. Here then is our third question: "What hard evidence do you have?" The fact that you are just dying to believe something is not hard evidence -- except perhaps about your state of mind.

 Why do we conduct trials if not to find out what happened? This is not some scandal covered up by the military and unearthed by the media. The military reported all of this months ago, and the media only went ballistic over it after photos became available.

 The military hasn't even delayed a court martial. In the civilian world, Scott Peterson was arrested before all this happened in Iraq and his trial still has not yet begun, while the court martial of the Iraqi soldiers will begin this month.

 Let us return to the costs for a moment.

 The cost of having high officials spending their time on prison administration in Iraq is not spending that time on other things on which the survival of this country may depend. Time spent covering your backside is time not spent doing your job.

 But there is yet another cost.

 You cannot replace high officials in government every time the media go ballistic and expect high quality people, with numerous alternatives elsewhere, to go spend their time serving their country in government, if it means the risk of being dumped in disgrace because the hyenas are howling.

 The short time horizon of politicians during an election year means that the long-run availability of scarce talent is likely to get very little attention from the pols. That is all the more reason why the rest of us need to keep our heads amid all the shrill rhetoric.

 We have to think about the future of this country -- not only our own future but the future of our children and grandchildren.

©2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Contact Thomas Sowell | Read Sowell's biography



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mediabias; thomassowell

1 posted on 05/18/2004 10:10:52 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Sockdologer

Good questions.


2 posted on 05/18/2004 10:15:48 PM PDT by jwalburg (There's more indignation over a prisoner with underwear on his head than one with no head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
FanTAS-Tic!

Thomas, I love you.

3 posted on 05/18/2004 10:16:29 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Sowell PING!


4 posted on 05/18/2004 10:37:50 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (I approve this message: character and integrity matter. Bush/Cheney for '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush
Chappaquiddick Fats and the other 'rats should consider the possibility of an extreme backlash to their quazi-treasonous behaviour if the war heats up, or there is another 9-11 (or worse.)

Lord Haw Haw was hung for less.

5 posted on 05/18/2004 10:44:57 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

We had the 3 top field commanders in DC today for this idiotic senate hearing. They had to leave the field to answer questions about 6 perverts. They had to fly out of a combat zone with all of the resulting hazards that entails. They had to leave the theater at a time when, according to the press, terrorists managed to find the ONE sarin filled artillery round in all of Iraq and use it for an IED.


6 posted on 05/18/2004 10:52:39 PM PDT by Texasforever (The French love John Kerry. He is their new Jerry Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

What's the saying? They swallow elephants, and strain at gnats?


7 posted on 05/18/2004 10:54:33 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

This made too much sense.


8 posted on 05/18/2004 10:55:35 PM PDT by Rokurota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

You are much too kind to the treasonous bastards.


9 posted on 05/18/2004 10:56:30 PM PDT by Texasforever (The French love John Kerry. He is their new Jerry Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Chappaquiddick Fats and the other 'rats should consider the possibility of an extreme backlash to their quazi-treasonous behaviour if the war heats up, or there is another 9-11 (or worse.)

I think there is a backlash coming anyway...I'd hope there wouldn't be another 9-11 to force it, though.

I do believe that we have a tremendous opportunity to get our side of the story out to the public. I'm amazed at the ideas that pass here, and the technology that is available to us, to make media that is as informative as it is entertaining. PowerPoint, Photoshop, FrontPage...the list goes on. We must continue to use any and every means available to tell our side.

Right around the time of the Demoncrat National Convention, I will be going on vacation (though that's not why I am going on vacation). In between morning golf and evening skates on the beach (SoCal native that I am), I will be hitting FR hard, with commentary on why I am again voting for the President.

I will be producing my own advertisements, as if they were campaign ads, and my own videos, and burning them onto DVDs for easy distribution. No matter how this ends, I will not have it said of me afterwards, that I didn't do what I could, to stand behind my President, our President, and to let him finish what he started.

Lord Haw Haw was hung for less.

Please forgive my ignorance...but who was Lord Haw Haw?

10 posted on 05/18/2004 10:59:51 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (I approve this message: character and integrity matter. Bush/Cheney for '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

Lord Haw-Haw was an Englishman who broadcast Nazi propaganda from Germany during the second World War.

He deserved to dis a far less pleasant death than mere hanging.


11 posted on 05/18/2004 11:18:21 PM PDT by Don W (If your OUTGO exceeds your INCOME, your UPKEEP will be your DOWNFALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson