[spetznaz]

The only way the left is going to accept that there were WMDs in Iraq (once they have finished splitting hairs about the time frame: as in 'we mean after the 1st Gulf War there were none') is if we come across an underground site with tons and tons and tons of bio-weapons, and maybe a nuke or two. Anything less than that, including chemical weapons, will just not do.

For the Left Iraq just cannot have WMDs, because if it does then they cannot say the war was a sham.

[rdb3]

For the Left Iraq just cannot have WMDs, because if it does then they cannot say the war was a sham.

That's a given with the Left.

But riddle me this, Batman: What about our own anti-war Right who swore up and down that Saddam didn't have WMD?