Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Newbomb Turk

The fact is that MOST convoys pass through without incident. MOST convoys have no enemy contact at all. And I've convoyed through Fallujah, Ramadi, Tikrit, Anaconda, and Baghdad unarmed and in an unarmored SUV.

And for the poster that asked, it was 106F at midnight about a week ago when the winds were hot from the south and blowing dust all over. Those storms lasted the best part of the week and culminated last Saturday. The rest of the time has been into the high 90's already.


152 posted on 05/19/2004 5:22:38 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (Coming to you live from HESCO city...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye; R. Scott; Newbomb Turk; IDontLikeToPayTaxes; Poohbah

Excellent excellent read that explains what happened that day in a part of Iraq. A few uneducated comments of this poster who has never been in the military:

1. Most people here need to pay heed to R. Scott's posts. He is terse, terser than me and I am terse, but he is on point if you think about what he is saying.

2. Everyone also needs to understand that 9 April is the beginning of a change in Iraq. For month up to then things were calmer and calming down. Then the situation exploded.

3. Per the point that Poohbah and R.Scott were making, it is likely air support was dealing the possibility of colalition troops losing control in al Najaf and other places where Sadr's supporters were causing even more problems. As I remember the Italian or Spanish troops were in very serious trouble and they had trouble defending their base?

4. Newbomb Turk I agree we are paying now for minimizing Iraqi civilian casualties. Had we put these people in the position of post WWII Japanese or Germans where their main worry was getting enough food to survive the winter, they would be much more docile. But this time we want to act as if the problem was the leader not the citizens. In WWII we blamed the Germans and Japanese. I also agree with IDontLikeToPayTaxes that we may be back in Iraq with unconditional surrender demands in two decades as was the case with Germany from 1918 until 1941. I am not saying this is not a risk the US should not have taken, but it is a risk associated with minimizing civilian causualties.

A very interesting post and thread. Too bad old media is not able to cover the war on terror and we have to rely on new media to cover it.


154 posted on 05/19/2004 6:03:17 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson