Remember, Hans Blix says that we haven't yet found enough WMDs to be considered to have found WMDs. Until we find a Bondesque secret facility hidden in the desert with some sort of nefarious doomsday device ready to launch with 10 seconds notice, Bush lied about WMDs.
It would still be a "lie" because the doomsday device wasn't where Bush said it would be. Plus, he would catch grief for "not connecting the dots" and using "faulty intelligence". Additionally, he would be absolutely crucified for being "distracted" by the hunt for Osama Bin Laden when the real War On Terror is in Iraq.
Does anyone remember the big facility that our troops liberated on the march to Bagdad? Initial reports mentioned how a high ranking Iraqi General and some troopies were guarding the place, and it initially had all the earmarkings of a chemical munitions plant. Subsequently, the place was dismissed as just a fertilizer factory.
THEN - a few days ago the minor news is that Saddam's boys routinely hid their chemical agent facilities in dual-use factories, like fertilizer plants. Huh? Where's the connect with the guarded facility we liberated over a year ago?
It seems we have smatterings of evidence that together add up to substantial justification in believing that WMD were in the hands of the old tyrant. But, the mainstream media would rather make the case that it all adds up to nothing; to do otherwise would be to vindicate the POTUS.