Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GORELICK: WE WERE TOO EASY ON RUDY [KEAN AGREES]
Newsday ^ | 5/21/04

Posted on 05/21/2004 4:37:54 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar

BY THOMAS FRANK WASHINGTON BUREAU; Staff writers Graham Rayman and Dan Janison contributed to this story.

May 21, 2004

WASHINGTON - A member of the Sept. 11 commission expressed regret yesterday over the questioning of former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani on Wednesday and said the panel should have pressed him on failures in the city's response to 9/11 instead of praising him so lavishly.

Commissioner Jamie Gorelick said she was "disappointed in us in a way that I haven't been in the past" after the hearing Wednesday. Many relatives of people killed in the World Trade Center criticized and in some cases jeered the commission for not asking Giuliani about problems they say may have led to the deaths of hundreds of civilians and firefighters.

"This commission would not exist but for these families, and they fought for these hearings and they deserved to hear themselves the answers to the questions," Gorelick said in an interview. "They deserved to have the questions asked, and we did not do that."

Commission chairman Thomas Kean suggested the criticism may be valid.

"It's not that we didn't find the facts. We have them," Gorelick said, referring to commission disclosures about problems with police and fire communications and coordination. "We should have recognized the importance of asking the four or five critical factual questions, not wasting a lot of time in complementing the mayor."

Gorelick, a former deputy U.S. attorney under President Bill Clinton, added, "I regret that we did not ask the hard questions about the [Fire Department] radios, about the command structure, about the incident management, about the placement of the OEM offices."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911commission; giulianitestimony; gorelick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 05/21/2004 4:37:55 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

Who cares what Gore-Lick and Kean think?


2 posted on 05/21/2004 4:40:23 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

If they tried to get rough with Rudy he would have handed them
their heads.


3 posted on 05/21/2004 4:40:42 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

Gorelick thinks the commission spent too much time complimenting the mayor? Yeah, we certainly wouldn't want to give him any praise for how he handled such a disaster! It would have been much more dignified to say his response wasn't worthy of the Boy Scouts.


4 posted on 05/21/2004 4:40:49 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

The dog and pony show continues in the attempt to damage Rudy in a run against That Woman.

Gorelick has a lot of explaining to do that hasn't been addressed.

BTW, if they have all the current information, why can't they predict and take steps to prevent the next attack? I assume that this is what this is all about, isn't it? Not getting the facts down to handle things better, but to blame and prognosticate?


5 posted on 05/21/2004 4:43:36 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Vote Kerry if you want to commit national suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

"We should have recognized the importance of asking the four or five critical factual questions, not wasting a lot of time in complementing the mayor."


This whole commission has been a joke. They should not have been spending ANY time on complimenting or criticizing or attacking anyone, the whole thing through.

Everything should have been researched and conducted in private, and a report released at the end. The temptation to grandstand has been too much for these people, instead of really constructively addressing what problems did exist.


6 posted on 05/21/2004 4:44:55 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

At least Rudy testified... UNDER OATH.

Which is more than Gorelick did.


7 posted on 05/21/2004 4:47:00 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

"GORELICK: WE WERE TOO EASY ON RUDY [KEAN AGREES]"

No, Rudy was too easy on you.


8 posted on 05/21/2004 4:47:31 AM PDT by Lord Basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care

""This commission would not exist but for these families, and they fought for these hearings and they deserved to hear themselves the answers to the questions," Gorelick said in an interview. "They deserved to have the questions asked, and we did not do that.""

First question would be, "Chairperson Gorelick, please explain your irresponsibility in creating a wall between the CIA and the FBI after the 1993 bombing of the WTC."

I think if we start from there and move forward we can probably get the answers to the question sof the relatives.



9 posted on 05/21/2004 4:48:54 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Only difference between the liberals and the Nazis is that the liberals love the Communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Time for more communications with the Commission?

info@9-11commission.gov

10 posted on 05/21/2004 4:51:06 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

Good point! Gorelick should be a witness, not a commisioner.


11 posted on 05/21/2004 4:55:13 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Certainly Gorelick (who has no business being on the commission because of her conflict of interest) bears responsibility and should be made to testify under oath.
12 posted on 05/21/2004 4:57:54 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
"It's not that we didn't find the facts. We have them," Gorelick said, referring to commission disclosures about problems with police and fire communications and coordination.

"In fact, I wrote them," Gorelick added.

13 posted on 05/21/2004 4:59:54 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lord Basil
Ain;t that the truth. The "Commision" managed to PO even liberal New Yorkers. Most Democrats in NYC are not of the radical left of inheitors of the New Deal patranoage machine or the old socially progressive (but not anti-american) school of the pre war East Coast Wasp elites.

Throwing garabage on the NYPD, the FDNY or Rudy is about as politically tone deaf as one could be. It shows how completely out of touch these people are with even NYC, let alone the nation.

It should be pointed out that Kerrey runs the New Scool for Social Research which is openly and extrememly hard left - perhaps the most hard left academy in the nation. It makes Berkeley look like a slightly left of center institution.

This commission is driven by the hard left and the Clintonistas's funtionaries.

Perhaps Bush was right after all to put such weak Republicans on it in the first place. I for one think that they have discredited themselves to the American people. Rudy needs to get on the media soon and say his peace about this.

14 posted on 05/21/2004 5:01:18 AM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
"We should have recognized the importance of asking the four or five critical factual questions, not wasting a lot of time in complementing the mayor asking editorialized questions and grandstanding to the camera."
15 posted on 05/21/2004 5:02:13 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist

Gorelick is pretty much an A$$ wipe


16 posted on 05/21/2004 5:03:36 AM PDT by DooDahhhh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

Jamie Gorelick said she was "disappointed ..."

Jamie, I am disappointed too -- disappointed that YOU haven't been put under oath and made to testify.


17 posted on 05/21/2004 5:03:59 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar

The commission has degenerated into an obscenity and I'm still waiting for the GOP to grow enough balls to say that out loud.


18 posted on 05/21/2004 5:04:21 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Oh brother. These people are insane! Can't they at least pretend to be on a fact-finding mission??!!

But..., there's no doubt that any report this "august" body produces will be discredited from the get-go.

19 posted on 05/21/2004 5:04:33 AM PDT by Molly Pitcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
School yard antics. When Rudy was there with an opportunity to defend himself the commission cowered. Now that he's a safe distance away, they fluff up. Damn childish.
20 posted on 05/21/2004 5:05:03 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson