Let's see; teenagers are not of sufficient maturity to decide to expose their bodies to a tanning booth, but are of sufficient maturity to expose their bodies to abortion. This is in the Constitution, right?
2+2=5
Sounds logical to me
/liberal
Abortions for teens are only performed when the life of the mother is at risk. Am I missing something here?!?!
PING to the newly-created REPUBLICAN PARTY REPTILE ping list, named after our spiritual founder, P.J. O'Rourke. What is the Republican Party Reptile? It is a creature of the eighties. Its neoconservatism with its pants down around its ankles, the Rehnquist Supreme Court on drugs, a disco Hobbes living without shame or federally mandated safety regulations. The Republican Party Reptile supports a strong defense policy, but sees no reason to conduct it while sober. The RPR believes in minimum government interference in private affairsunless the government brings over extra girls and some ice. In short, the RPR is the new label that our political spectrum has been crying out forthe conservative with a sense of humor and a healthy dose of depravity.
To be added or subtracted, just ask. :o)
Your argument does not make sense.
I'd be madder if someone performed an abortion on my daughter without my knowledge or consent.
They should not be allowed to do either without parental consent as a minimum.